...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine >Perceived barriers and facilitators to goals of care discussions in the emergency department: A descriptive analysis of the views of emergency medicine physicians and residents
【24h】

Perceived barriers and facilitators to goals of care discussions in the emergency department: A descriptive analysis of the views of emergency medicine physicians and residents

机译:急诊科中讨论讨论目标的障碍和促进者:对急诊医生和居民观点的描述性分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectiveFew studies have examined the challenges faced by emergency medicine (EM) physicians in conducting goals of care discussions. This study is the first to describe the perceived barriers and facilitators to these discussions as reported by Canadian EM physicians and residents.MethodsA team of EM, palliative care, and internal medicine physicians developed a survey comprising multiple choice, Likert-scale and open-ended questions to explore four domains of goals-of-care discussions: training; communication; environment; and patient beliefs.ResultsSurveys were sent to 273 EM staff and residents in six sites, and 130 (48%) responded. Staff physicians conducted goals-of-care discussions several times per month or more, 74.1% (80/108) of the time versus 35% (8/23) of residents. Most agreed that goals-of-care discussions are within their scope of practice (92%), they felt comfortable having these discussions (96%), and they are adequately trained (73%). However, 66% reported difficulty initiating goals-of-care discussions, and 54% believed that admitting services should conduct them. Main barriers were time (46%), lack of a relationship with the patient (25%), patient expectations (23%), no prior discussions (21%), and the inability to reach substitute decision-makers (17%). Fifty-four percent of respondents indicated that the availability of 24-hour palliative care consults would facilitate discussions in the emergency department (ED).ConclusionsImportant barriers to discussing goals of care in the ED were identified by respondents, including acuity and lack of prior relationship, highlighting the need for system and environmental interventions, including improved availability of palliative care services in the ED.
机译:客观研究很少研究紧急医学(EM)医师在进行护理讨论目标时面临的挑战。这项研究是第一个描述由加拿大EM医师和居民报告的被认为阻碍这些讨论的障碍和促进者的方法。方法EM,姑息治疗和内科医师团队开发了一项包括多项选择,李克特量表和不限成员名额的调查问题,以探讨护理目标讨论的四个领域:培训;通讯;环境;结果调查被发送给六个地点的273名EM人员和居民,有130名(48%)做出了回应。参谋医师每月进行几次或更多次护理目标讨论,占时间的74.1%(80/108),而居民的时间为35%(8/23)。大多数人同意护理目标的讨论在其实践范围内(92%),他们对进行这些讨论感到自在(96%),并且接受了充分的培训(73%)。但是,有66%的人表示很难发起护理目标讨论,而54%的人认为接受服务应该进行讨论。主要障碍包括时间(46%),与患者缺乏关系(25%),患者期望(23%),没有事先讨论(21%)以及无法与替代决策者联系(17%)。 54%的受访者表示,提供24小时姑息治疗咨询服务将有助于急诊科(ED)的讨论。结论受访者确定了在ED中讨论医疗目标的重要障碍,包括敏锐度和缺乏先前的关系,强调了对系统和环境干预措施的需求,包括在急诊科中改善姑息治疗服务的可用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号