...
【24h】

A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration

机译:腰骶过渡性椎骨及相关椎骨数量综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To review the current literature on methods of accurate numeration of vertebral segments in patients with Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs). LSTVs are a common congenital anomaly of the L5–S1 junction. While their clinical significance has been debated, unquestionable is the need for their identification prior to spinal surgery. We hypothesize that there are no reliable landmarks by which we can accurately number transitional vertebrae, and thus a full spinal radiograph is required. Methods A Pubmed and EMBASE search using various combinations of specific key words including “LSTV”, “lumbosacral transitional vertebrae”, “count”, “vertebral numbering”, and “number” was performed. Results The gold standard for spinal segment numeration in patients with LSTV remains whole spine imaging and counting caudally, starting from C2. If whole spine imaging is not available, the use of the iliac crest tangent sign on coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has fairly reliable sensitivity and specificity (81 and 64–88%, respectively) for accurate numeration of LSTV. The role of paraspinal anatomic markers such as the right renal artery, superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation, and conus medullaris, for identification of vertebral levels is unreliable and should not be used. Conclusions A sagittal whole spine view should be added as a scout view when patients obtain lumbar MRI to standardize the vertebral numbering technique. To date, there has been no other method for accurate numeration of a transitional vertebral segment, other than counting caudally from C2. Graphical abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
机译:目的探讨目前关于腰骶过渡性椎骨(LSTV)患者精确数量的方法的目前文献。 LSTV是L5-S1结的常见先天性异常。虽然他们的临床意义一直在争论,但毫无疑问是在脊柱手术之前需要鉴定。我们假设没有可靠的地标,我们可以准确地转型椎骨,因此需要完全脊柱射线。方法采用包括“LSTV”,“LSTV”,“腰骶过渡椎骨”,“计数”,“椎骨编号”和“数量”的各种组合的PUBMED和EMBASE搜索。结果LSTV患者脊柱段数量的金标准仍然是整个脊柱成像并从C2开始计算。如果不可用整个脊柱成像,则在冠状磁共振成像(MRI)上使用ILIAC CREST切线符号具有相当可靠的敏感性和特异性(分别为81和64-88%),以便准确计算LSTV。肩胛骨动脉,优质肠系膜动脉,主动脉分叉和Conus Medullaris等作用,用于识别椎体水平,不应使用。结论当患者获得腰椎MRI以规范椎骨编号技术时,应添加矢状全脊柱视图。迄今为止,除了从C2透明地计算过渡性椎间段的准确数量,没有其他方法。图形摘要这些幻灯片可以在电子补充材料下检索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号