...
【24h】

Clinical features of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots versus lumbar intervertebral disc herniations.

机译:连体腰骶神经根与腰椎间盘突出症的临床特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Unidentified nerve root anomalies, conjoined nerve root (CNR) being the most common, may account for some failed spinal surgical procedures as well as intraoperative neural injury. Previous studies have failed to clinically discern CNR from herniated discs and found their surgical outcomes as being inferior. A comparative study of CNR and disc herniations was undertaken. Between 2002 and 2008, 16 consecutive patients were diagnosed intraoperatively with CNR. These patients were matched 1:2 with 32 patients diagnosed with intervertebral disc herniations. Matching was done according to age (within 5 years), gender and level of pathology. Surgery for patients with CNR or disc herniations consisted of routine microsurgical techniques with microdiscectomy, hemilaminotomy, hemilaminectomy and foraminotomy as indicated. Outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index and the Short Form-36 Questionnaire. Clinical presentation, imaging studies and surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. Conjoined nerve root's incidence in this study was 5.8% of microdiscectomies performed. The S1 nerve root was mainly involved (69%), followed by L5 (31%). Patients with CNR tended to present with nerve root claudication (44%) compared to the radiculopathy accompanying disc herniations (75%). Neurologic deficit was less prevalent among patients with CNR. Nerve root tension tests were not helpful in distinguishing between the etiologies. Radiologist's suspicion threshold for nerve root anomalies was low (0%) and no coronal reconstructions were obtained. The surgeon's clinical suspicion accurately predicted 40% of the CNRs. Surgical outcomes did not differ between the cohorts regarding the rate of postoperative improvement, but CNR patients showed a trend toward having mildly worse long-term outcomes. Suspecting CNRs preoperatively is beneficial for appropriate treatment and avoiding the risk of intraoperative neural injury. With nerve root claudication and imaging suggestive of a "disc herniation", the surgeon should be alert to the differential diagnosis of a CNR. Treatment is directed at obtaining adequate decompression by laminectomy and foraminotomy to relieve the lateral recess stenosis. Outcomes can be expected to be similar to routine disc herniations.
机译:未识别的神经根异常,连体神经根(CNR)是最常见的,可能占一些失败的脊柱外科手术以及术中神经损伤。以前的研究未能从突出的椎间盘中临临临床CNR,并发现它们的手术结果是劣等。进行了CNR和椎间盘突出的比较研究。在2002年至2008年间,连续16名患者用CNR术中诊断诊断。这些患者与诊断术椎间盘突出症的32例患者匹配1:2。匹配是根据年龄(5年内),性别和病理水平完成的。 CNR或椎间盘突出患者的手术由常规显微外科技术组成,具有微药片切除术,血栓切开术,血栓切除术和表征如所示。使用Oswestry残疾指数和短表36问卷测量结果。在组之间比较临床介绍,成像研究和手术结果。在本研究中的连体神经根的发病率为5.8%的微量药片表现。 S1神经根主要涉及(69%),其次是L5(31%)。与伴随圆盘突出症(75%)相比,CNR患者倾向于呈现神经根部跛行(44%)。 CNR患者的神经系统缺陷不太普遍。神经根张力试验在区分病因方面没有有助于。放射学家神经根异常的怀疑阈值低(0%),并且没有获得冠状重建。外科医生的临床怀疑准确地预测了40%的CNR。外科结果在术后改善率之间的群组之间没有差异,但CNR患者表现出较为较差的长期结果的趋势。怀疑术前是有益的CNR,可适当的治疗和避免术中神经损伤的风险。凭着神经根部跛行和成像的暗示“圆盘遍布”,外科医生应警惕鉴别诊断的CNR。治疗旨在通过椎体切除术和传染症获得足够的减压,以缓解横向凹陷狭窄。结果可以预期与常规椎间盘突出症相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号