首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine Australasia: EMA >The need for improving access to emergency care through community involvement in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A case study of cardiac arrest in Hanoi, Vietnam
【24h】

The need for improving access to emergency care through community involvement in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A case study of cardiac arrest in Hanoi, Vietnam

机译:通过社区参与低收入和中等收入国家的需要改善应急护理的必要性:以越南河内的心脏骤停

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest patients require immediate interventions by bystanders and emergency medical services (EMS). However, in many low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC), bystanders witnessing a cardiac arrest rarely perform chest compressions and contact EMS. This paper attempts to draw lessons from a case of a patient with a cardiac arrest who could have survived with immediate interventions. A 40 year old man collapsed following electrocution at a construction site. His colleagues immediately transferred him to hospital via taxi, without performing chest compressions. At the hospital he showed ventricular fibrillation; resuscitation attempts failed and he died. Ventricular fibrillation due to electrocution is a benign type of cardiac arrest. The chance of survival increases with immediate chest compressions and prompt defibrillation. We discuss the reasons why the bystanders did not perform resuscitation or contact EMS and identify approaches for the improvement of pre‐hospital care in LMICs.
机译:摘要医院外心脏骤停患者需要通过旁观者和紧急医疗服务(EMS)即时干预措施。然而,在许多低收入国家(LMIC)中,目睹心脏骤停的旁观者很少能执行胸部按压和联系EMS。本文试图从患者的案例中汲取课程,该案件可以用直接干预措施幸存下来。一个40岁的男子在施工现场触电后倒塌。他的同事立即通过出租车将他转移到医院,而不会表演胸部按压。在医院,他表现出心室颤动;复苏尝试失败,他死了。由于电局导致的心室颤动是一种良性的心脏骤停。生存的机会随着胸部按压的立即增加和迅速除颤。我们讨论了旁观者没有进行复苏或联系EMS的原因,并确定改善LMIC预留前护理的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号