...
首页> 外文期刊>Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution >Different mechanisms drive the maintenance of polymorphism at loci subject to strong versus weak fluctuating selection
【24h】

Different mechanisms drive the maintenance of polymorphism at loci subject to strong versus weak fluctuating selection

机译:不同的机制驱动了在基因座上的多态性维持较强的弱波动选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The long-running debate about the role of selection in maintaining genetic variation has been given new impetus by the discovery of hundreds of seasonally oscillating polymorphisms in wild Drosophila, possibly stabilized by an alternating summer-winter selection regime. Historically, there has been skepticism about the potential of temporal variation to balance polymorphism, because selection must be strong to have a meaningful stabilizing effect-unless dominance also varies over time ("reversal of dominance"). Here, we develop a simplified model of seasonally variable selection that simultaneously incorporates four different stabilizing mechanisms, including two genetic mechanisms ("cumulative overdominance" and reversal of dominance), as well as ecological "storage" ("protection from selection" and boom-bust demography). We use our model to compare the stabilizing effects of these mechanisms. Although reversal of dominance has by far the greatest stabilizing effect, we argue that the three other mechanisms could also stabilize polymorphism under plausible conditions, particularly when all three are present. With many loci subject to diminishing returns epistasis, reversal of dominance stabilizes many alleles of small effect. This makes the combination of the other three mechanisms, which are incapable of stabilizing small effect alleles, a better candidate for stabilizing the detectable frequency oscillations of large effect alleles.
机译:关于选择在维持遗传变异方面的作用的长期争论已经通过发现野生果蝇的数百个季节性振荡多态性,通过交替的夏季冬季选择制度稳定,已经给予了新的推动。从历史上看,对平衡多态性的时间变化的可能性有疑问,因为选择必须强大,以具有有意义的稳定效果 - 除非主导地位也随着时间的推移而变化(“优势逆转”)。在这里,我们开发了一种简化的季节性变量选择模型,同时包含四种不同的稳定机制,包括两个遗传机制(“累积跨越”和逆转的主导地位),以及生态“储存”(“从选择保护”和繁荣 - 胸围人口统计学)。我们使用我们的模型来比较这些机制的稳定效果。虽然逆转的统治者稳定效果较大,但我们认为三种其他机制也可能在合理的条件下稳定多态性,特别是当所有三个存在时。随着越来越多的基因座,回报超越超越超越,优势逆转稳定了许多小效果的等位基因。这使得其他三种机制的组合,其不能稳定小效果等位基因,是稳定大效果等位基因的可检测频率振荡的更好候选者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号