首页> 外文期刊>Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution >The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl
【24h】

The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl

机译:红丛林派中不同性能机制的男性相关性对比作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In structured populations, competition for reproductive opportunities should be relaxed among related males. The few tests of this prediction often neglect the fact that sexual selection acts through multiple mechanisms, both before and after mating. We performed experiments to study the role of within-group male relatedness across pre- and postcopulatory mechanisms of sexual selection in social groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, in which two related males and one unrelated male competed over females unrelated to all the males. We confirm theoretical expectations that, after controlling for male social status, competition over mating was reduced among related males. However, this effect was contrasted by other sexual selection mechanisms. First, females biased male mating in favor of the unrelated male, and might also favor his inseminations after mating. Second, males invested more-rather than fewer-sperm in postcopulatory competition with relatives. A number of factors may contribute to explain this counterintuitive pattern of sperm allocation, including trade-offs between male investment in pre- versus postcopulatory competition, differences in the relative relatedness of pre- versus postcopulatory competitors, and female bias in sperm utilization in response to male relatedness. Collectively, these results reveal that within-group male relatedness may have contrasting effects in different mechanisms of sexual selection.
机译:在结构化人口中,应在相关的雄性中放松生殖机会的竞争。这种预测的几个测试往往忽略了在交配之前和之后的性能通过多种机制起作用的事实。我们进行了实验,研究了群体中群体相关性的作用,跨越红丛林系列血红素群体,巨大群体,其中两个相关的男性和一个不相关的男性与与所有男性无关的女性竞争。我们确认理论期望,在控制男性社会地位后,相关雄性的交配竞争减少。然而,这种效果与其他性选择机制形成鲜明对比。首先,女性偏见雄性交配有利于不相关的男性,并且可能在交配后可能有利于他的潜在。其次,男性在与亲属的审查竞争中投入更多而不是更少的精子。许多因素可能有助于解释这种对称的精子分配模式,包括对临床竞争前的男性投资之间的权衡,而临床前竞争对手的相对相关性,以及精子利用的女性偏见男性相关性。这些结果表明,组内的男性相关性可能在不同的性选择机制中具有对比效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号