首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review
【24h】

Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review

机译:膀胱治疗肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌的膀胱培养的危重分析:系统评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context Aims of bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) are to offer a quality-of-life advantage and avoid potential morbidity or mortality of radical cystectomy (RC) without compromising oncologic outcomes. Because of the lack of a completed randomised controlled trial, oncologic equivalence of bladder preservation modality treatments compared with RC remains unknown. Objective This systematic review sought to assess the modern bladder-preservation treatment modalities, focusing on trimodal therapy (TMT) in MIBC. Evidence acquisition A systematic literature search in the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed from 1980 to July 2013. Evidence synthesis Optimal bladder-preservation treatment includes a safe transurethral resection of the bladder tumour as complete as possible followed by radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent radiosensitising chemotherapy. A standard radiation schedule includes external-beam RT to the bladder and limited pelvic lymph nodes to an initial dose of 40 Gy, with a boost to the whole bladder to 54 Gy and a further tumour boost to a total dose of 64-65 Gy. Radiosensitising chemotherapy with phase 3 trial evidence in support exists for cisplatin and mitomycin C plus 5-fluorouracil. A cystoscopic assessment with systematic rebiopsy should be performed at TMT completion or early after TMT induction. Thus, nonresponders are identified early to promptly offer salvage RC. The 5-yr cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates range from 50% to 82% and from 36% to 74%, respectively, with salvage cystectomy rates of 25-30%. There are no definitive data to support the benefit of using of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Critical to good outcomes is proper patient selection. The best cancers eligible for bladder preservation are those with low-volume T2 disease without hydronephrosis or extensive carcinoma in situ. Conclusions A growing body of accumulated data suggests that bladder preservation with TMT leads to acceptable outcomes and therefore may be considered a reasonable treatment option in well-selected patients. Patient summary Treatment based on a combination of resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy as bladder-sparing strategies may be considered as a reasonable treatment option in properly selected patients.
机译:膀胱保存在肌肉侵入性膀胱癌(MIBC)的上下文的目标是提供生活质量优势,避免潜在的膀胱切除术(RC)的发病率或死亡率,而不会影响肿瘤后果。由于缺乏完整的随机对照试验,与RC相比,膀胱保存模态处理的肿瘤性等效性仍然未知。目的这一系统评价试图评估现代膀胱保存治疗方式,重点是MIBC中的粉末治疗(TMT)。有证据获取在2013年至7月1980年至7月中进行了PubMed和Cochrane数据库中的系统文献搜索。证据合成最佳膀胱保存治疗包括尽可能完整的膀胱肿瘤的安全经尿道切除,然后通过并发放射敏感性(RT)。化疗。标准辐射时间表包括外部梁RT到膀胱rt和有限的盆腔淋巴结到40 gy的初始剂量,并升压到整个膀胱至54 gy,并且进一步的肿瘤升压到总剂量为64-65 gy。具有3阶段试验证据的辐射敏感化疗存在于Cisplatin和丝裂霉素C加5-氟尿嘧啶。患有系统重生的膀胱镜评估应在TMT完成或TMT诱导后的早期进行。因此,未反应者早期鉴定以及时提供救助RC。 5岁的癌症特异性生存率和整体存活率的范围为50%至82%,分别为36%至74%,脉膀胱切除术率为25-30%。没有明确的数据来支持使用Neoadjuvant或佐剂化疗的益处。对良好结果至关重要的是适当的患者选择。符合膀胱保存条件的最佳癌症是具有低体积T2疾病的癌症,没有肾内肾小序或原位癌症。结论累积数据的生长体现表明,用TMT的膀胱保存导致可接受的结果,因此可以在精选患者中被认为是合理的治疗选择。 Patient summary Treatment based on a combination of resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy as bladder-sparing strategies may be considered as a reasonable treatment option in properly selected patients.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号