...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics: official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V >Quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing: A systematic review of current status, challenges and future perspectives
【24h】

Quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing: A systematic review of current status, challenges and future perspectives

机译:制药制造业的质量:系统审查当前状态,挑战和未来的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quality by Design (QbD) was originated in the broad domain of Quality Management and was recently adapted and formalized in specific terms for assisting pharmaceutical companies efforts towards market and operational excellence. However, despite some impressive success stories, the pharmaceutical industry have not yet fully embraced QbD, particularly in routine commercial manufacturing (Rantanen and Khinast, 2015; Punal Peces et al., 2016). In this review, we aim to analyse the current state of implementation of QbD methodologies and tools in the pharmaceutical industry, extracting patterns and trends and identifying gaps and opportunities that may be considered to improve QbD adoption. For this purpose, a critical analysis of 60 research papers was performed, whose contents were classified, compared and summarized at different abstraction levels. Our analysis reveals the following tools as the frequently adopted for conducting each activity: Risk Assessment (RA) - Ishikawa Diagram, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Risk Estimation Matrix (REM); Screening Design of Experiments (DoE) - 2-level Full and Fractional Factorial Designs; Optimisation DoE - Central Composite Design (CCD). Emerging trends include the growing interest in quantifying and managing the impact of raw materials' attributes variability on process and product, as well as the development of Retrospective QbD approaches (rQbD) in complement to standard QbD.
机译:设计质量(QBD)起源于质量管理的广泛领域,最近在特定条款方面进行了调整和正式,以协助制药公司对市场和运营卓越的努力。然而,尽管有一些令人印象深刻的成功案例,但制药行业尚未完全接受QBD,特别是在常规商业制造业(Rantanen和Khinast,2015; Punal Peces等,2016)。在本综述中,我们的目标是分析药品行业QBD方法和工具的现状,提取模式和趋势以及识别可能被视为改善QBD采用的差距和机会。为此目的,进行了对60篇研究论文的关键分析,其内容分类,比较和总结在不同的抽象水平。我们的分析显示以下工具作为进行每项活动的经常采用:风险评估(RA) - Ishikawa图,失败模式和效果分析(FMEA)和风险估计矩阵(REM);实验筛选设计(DOE) - 2层全和分数阶段设计;优化DOE - 中央复合设计(CCD)。新兴趋势包括对原材料归属于过程和产品的变异性的影响,以及回顾性QBD方法(RQBD)的开发越来越令人兴趣,并补充标准QBD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号