...
首页> 外文期刊>European geriatric medicine. >P-659: Southampton Arm Fracture Frailty and Sarcopenia Study (SAFFSS): is it feasible to assess frailty and sarcopenia among older people in fracture clinic?
【24h】

P-659: Southampton Arm Fracture Frailty and Sarcopenia Study (SAFFSS): is it feasible to assess frailty and sarcopenia among older people in fracture clinic?

机译:P-659:南安普敦臂骨折脆弱和SARCOPENIA学习(SAFFSS):评估骨折诊所的老年人的脆弱和嗜睡症是可行的吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with increased risk of falls but are not routinely identified in fracture clinics. This study will evaluate the feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia among older people attending fracture clinic as a novel opportunity for identification and intervention. Methods: 100 people aged 65 + years with a wrist/upper arm fracture attending fracture clinics in one English acute trust will be assessed using six validated frailty measures and two sarcopenia tools. Those with either condition will be referred for comprehensive geriatric assessment by geriatric clinical services. Interviews with patients and healthcare professionals will explore their views about the acceptability of assessing frailty and sarcopenia. Results: So far 14 patients (median age 75 years; 5 male) have been recruited since March 2019. Frailty was identified among 3/14 (21%) patients using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS); 2/14 (14%) using each of Fried Frailty Phenotype, FRAIL scale and PRISMA; and 1/14 (7%) using the electronic frailty index (e-FI) and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) tool. Sarcopenia was found among 3/14 (21%) patients using both SARC-F and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). Data was complete for all patients with average assessment times of 1 min for PRISMA, CFS and SARC-F; 4-5 min for Fried Frailty Phenotype, FRAIL scale and SOF; and 9 min for EWGSOP criteria. Discussion: This study is ongoing and will demonstrate the best tools to screen for frailty and sarcopenia in this population, and identify the feasibility of using existing care pathways for their management.
机译:背景:脆弱和嗜睡症与跌倒的风险增加有关,但在骨折诊所不常规识别。本研究将评估老年人在参加骨折诊所作为一种识别和干预的新机遇的评估脆弱患者的可行性。方法:使用六个验证的脆弱措施和两个SARCOPENIA工具,100名65岁65岁左右的65岁+岁月的腕骨骨折,将评估六个急性信托中的裂缝诊所。任何条件的人都将被老年临床服务综合评估。对患者和医疗保健专业人员的访谈将探讨他们对评估脆弱和康迟腺的可接受性的看法。结果:目前,自2019年3月以来,招聘了14例患者(中位数年龄75岁; 5名男性)。使用临床脆弱尺度(CFS)的3/14(21%)患者患有脆弱; 2/14(14%)使用油炸脆弱的表型,虚线和普拉斯;使用电子脆弱指数(E-FI)和骨质疏松骨折(SOF)工具的研究1/14(7%)。 3/14(21%)患者在使用SARC-F和欧洲工作组(EWGSOP)的苏达尼亚血症患者(EWGSOP)中发现了SARCOPENIA。对于PRISMA,CFS和SARC-F的平均评估时间为1分钟的所有患者完成数据;炒脆弱表型,脆差和SOF的4-5分钟;和EWGSOP标准的9分钟。讨论:本研究正在进行中,将展示在本人口中筛选的最佳工具,并确定使用现有护理途径进行管理的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号