...
首页> 外文期刊>European geriatric medicine. >P-733: Is frailty possible to assess in geriatric hospitalized patients? The feasibility and compatibility of commonly used diagnostic criteria of frailty syndrome in everyday clinical practice
【24h】

P-733: Is frailty possible to assess in geriatric hospitalized patients? The feasibility and compatibility of commonly used diagnostic criteria of frailty syndrome in everyday clinical practice

机译:P-733:在老年住院患者中评估是否可以脆弱? 日常临床实践中常用综合征常用诊断标准的可行性和兼容性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: We assessed the prevalence of frailty syndrome in older patients hospitalized in the geriatric ward depending on the diagnostic criteria, feasibility of particular scales and compatibility between them. Methods: Patients consecutively admitted to the geriatric ward were included to the study. Four diagnostic scales were used to identify frailty syndrome: Fried criteria, 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), 40-item Frailty Index (FI) and FRAIL Scale. The compatibility of the scales was determined using Cohen's Kappa statistics. Results: 416 patients (mean age 81.2 ± 6.91 years) were admitted to the Department of Geriatrics in the period of the study. Depending on the scale used, the prevalence of frailty syndrome among the study population varied from 26.8% (FRAIL), 52.3% (CFS), 58.1% (Fried criteria) up to 62.9% (FI). CFS could be performed in 100% of the studied population, FI in 95.2%, FRAIL Scale in 89.7% and Fried scale in 79.8%. The highest level of agreement was found between CFS and Fried scale, with 70.2% of consistent ratings (Cohen Kappa 0.49). The FI and Fried scales (68.9%) and FI and CFS (68.7%) were also well-compatible. Conclusions: Patients of the geriatric ward are characterized by a high prevalence of frailty syndrome. The highest frequency was found when the FI was used, and the lowest—in the case of the FRAIL scale. The scales showed satisfactory agreement. The feasibility of particular diagnostic scales was high, however, the most difficult to use was the Fried scale, while CFS was possible to determine in all patients.
机译:简介:根据诊断标准,特定规模的可行性和它们之间的兼容性,我们评估了在老年病房住院的老年患者体外综合征的患病率。方法:在研究中包括携带对老年病房的患者。四种诊断尺度用于识别体外综合征:油炸标准,7点临床脆弱尺度(CFS),40项脆弱指数(FI)和虚线。使用Cohen的kappa统计确定尺度的兼容性。结果:416名患者(平均年龄为81.2±6.9​​1岁),在研究期间录取了老年病毒。根据所使用的规模,研究人群中脆弱综合征的患病率不同于26.8%(FRAIL),52.3%(CFS),58.1%(FI),58.1%(FI),58.1%(FI)。 CFS可以在100%的学习人口中进行,占95.2%,以89.7%的脆差率为79.8%。 CFS和炒规模之间发现了最高级别的协议,占持续评级的70.2%(Cohen Kappa 0.49)。 FI和FRIED秤(68.9%)和FI和CFS(68.7%)也兼容。结论:老年病病房患者的特点是患有脆弱综合征的高普遍性。当使用FI时,找到最高频率,并且在虚线的情况下最低。尺度表现出令人满意的协议。特定诊断尺度的可行性很高,但是,最难以使用的是炒规模,而CF可以在所有患者中确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号