首页> 外文期刊>European journal of health law >A Duty to Recontact in the Context of Genetics: Futuristic or Realistic?
【24h】

A Duty to Recontact in the Context of Genetics: Futuristic or Realistic?

机译:在遗传学背景下重新接触的责任:未来主义或现实?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Medical genetic testing, 'next generation sequencing', is increasingly generating data that could become useful for patients after they have been discharged from care. If new information is discovered that links a disease to a specific mutation, do health professionals have a legal duty to recontact their patients? Apart from other concerns (such as respecting the patient's right not to know), in many cases, this would require re-evaluation or re-analysis of the data. Taking such issues into account, we conclude that, at least at this point in time, it is not arguable that there is an unconditional duty of this kind. Health professionals should always do what can be reasonably expected from them to do justice to the patient's right to information. When there is reason to believe that recontacting would be of significant clinical relevance for the patient, they should do so, unless efforts and costs involved would be disproportional.
机译:医学遗传学检测'下一代测序'越来越多地发电,在他们从护理中排出后可能变得有用。 如果发现新信息,将疾病与特定突变联系起来,卫生专业人员是否有法律责任来重新接受患者? 除其他问题(例如尊重患者的权利不知道)外,在许多情况下,这将需要重新评估或重新分析数据。 考虑到此类问题,我们得出结论,至少在此时,这种情况并不是有无条件义务。 卫生专业人士应始终做出可合理的预期,以便对患者的信息权进行正当性。 当有理由相信重新接触对患者具有重要临床相关性时,他们应该这样做,除非所涉及的努力和成本是不均衡的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号