首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >Whose promises are worth more? How social status affects trust in promises
【24h】

Whose promises are worth more? How social status affects trust in promises

机译:谁的承诺值得更多? 社会地位如何影响对承诺的信任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Promises are among the most widely used tools for increasing trust in social hierarchies; yet the effect of social status on trust in promises is unknown. Here we used a modified version of the Trust Game, in which participants, acting as Investors, were paired with Trustees of varying social status who were given the opportunity to promise (or not) to return at least half of the multiplied amount (i.e., 4 x the amount invested). No return feedback was provided. Participants invested more in partners who promised than those who did not or whose promise information was concealed. Importantly, in both lab-manipulated (Exps. 1-3: math-induced) and pre-existing (Exp. 4: university-based) hierarchies, participants invested more in promises given by high status than low status partners. Post-experiment measures suggest that this may be due to greater expectations of honesty for high status than low status others. Potential explanations and implications are discussed.
机译:承诺是最广泛使用的工具,以增加社会等级资料的信任; 然而,社会地位对承诺信任的影响是未知的。 在这里,我们使用了一个改进版本的信托游戏,其中参与者作为投资者的参与者与不同的社会地位的受托人配对,他们有机会承诺(或不)返回至少一半的乘法金额(即, 4 x投资金额)。 没有提供退货反馈。 与会者在承诺的合作伙伴中投入更多,这些合作伙伴比没有隐瞒的承诺信息的人答应。 重要的是,在实验室操纵(Exps。1-3:数学诱导)和预先存在的(exp.4:基于大学的)层次结构中,参与者在高地位的承诺中投入更多的承诺,而不是低状态合作伙伴。 实验后的措施表明,这可能是由于对诚实的高地位的诚实提高预期。 讨论了潜在的解释和影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号