首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: Impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation
【24h】

Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: Impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation

机译:使用MRI和CT评估结肠直肠肝转移:观察者对组织病理学相关性诊断性能的影响和观察者差异性再现性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction To compare the diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility of CT and MRI in detecting colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) of observers with different levels of experience. Materials and methods Data from 51 CT and 54 MRI examinations of 105 patients with CRLM were analysed. Intraoperative and histopathological findings served as the reference standard. Analyses were performed by four observers with varying levels of experience regarding imaging of CRLM (reviewers A, B, C and D with respectively >20, >5, <1 and 0 years of experience). Per-segment sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's kappa (κ) for diagnosed segments and Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) for reported number of lesions were calculated. Results CT sensitivity and specificity was for reviewer A 89.71%/94.41%, B 78.50%/88.37%, C 63.55%/85.58%, D 84.11%/78.60% and regarding MRI A 90.40%/95.43%, B 74.40%/90.04%, C 60.00%/85.89% and D 65.60%/75.90%. The overall inter-observer agreement was higher for CT (κ = 0.43, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.75, p < 0.001) than MRI (κ = 0.38, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.65, p < 0.001). The experienced reviewers A and B achieved better agreement for MRI (κ = 0.54, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.77, p < 0.001) than CT (κ = 0.52, p < 0.00; ICC = 0.76, p < 0.001) unlike the less experienced C and D (MRI κ = 0.38, ICC = 0.63 and CT κ = 0.41, ICC = 0.74, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions The proficiency in detection of CRLM is significantly influenced by observer experience, although CT interpretation is less affected than MRI analysis.
机译:介绍,比较CT和MRI在检测具有不同体验水平的观察者的结直肠肝转移(CRLM)中的诊断性能和观察者间再现性。分析了51吨CT和54例CR1患者的51ct和54患者的材料和方法。术中和组织病理学发现用作参考标准。通过四个观察者进行分析,其具有不同关于CRLM成像的经验水平(分别有分别> 20,> 5,5年的经验的审核A,B,C和D)。计算出报告病变数量的诊断段和阶段相关系数(ICC)的每分段敏感性,特异性Cohen的Kappa(κ)。结果CT敏感性和特异性用于审稿人A 89.71%/ 94.41%,B 78.50%/ 88.3%,C 63.55%/ 85.58%,D 84.11%/ 78.60%,关于MRI A 90.40%/ 95.43%,B 74.40%/ 90.04 %,C 60.00%/ 85.89%和D 65.60%/ 75.90%。 CT(κ= 0.43,P <0.001; ICC = 0.75,P <0.001)的整体观察员间协议比MRI(κ= 0.38,P <0.001; ICC = 0.65,P <0.001)。经验丰富的审稿人A和B对MRI(κ= 0.54,P <0.001; ICC = 0.77,P <0.001)实现了更好的达成者(κ= 0.54,P <0.001),而不是CT(κ= 0.52,P <0.00; ICC = 0.76,P <0.001)与较少的经验丰富的C和D(MRIκ= 0.38,ICC = 0.63和CTκ= 0.41,ICC = 0.74,P <0.001)。结论检测CRLM检测的熟练程度受到观察者经验的显着影响,尽管CT解释不太受MRI分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号