首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancers >Assessment of Liver Metastases Using CT and MRI Scans in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Effects of Observer Experience on Diagnostic Accuracy
【2h】

Assessment of Liver Metastases Using CT and MRI Scans in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Effects of Observer Experience on Diagnostic Accuracy

机译:使用CT和MRI扫描评估胰管腺癌患者的肝转移:观察者经验对诊断准确性的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of radiologic experience on the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reporting on the liver metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LM of PDAC). Intra-individual CT and MRI examinations of 112 patients with clinically proven LM of PDAC were included. Four radiologists with varying years of experience (A > 20, B > 5, C > 1 and D < 1) assessed liver segments affected by LM of PDAC, as well as associated metastases occurring in each patient. Their sensitivity and specificity in evaluating the segments were compared. Cohen’s Kappa (κ) for diagnosed liver segments and Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) for the number of metastatic lesions in each patient were calculated. The radiologists’ sensitivity and specificity for the CT vs. MRI were, respectively: Reader A—94.4%, 90.3% vs. 96.6%, 94.8%; B—86.7%, 79.7% vs. 83.9%, 82.0%; C—78.0%, 76.7% vs. 83.3%, 78.9% and D—71.8%, 79.2% vs. 64.0%, 69.5%. Reviewers A and B achieved greater agreement in assessing results from the MRI (κ = 0.72, < 0.001; ICC = 0.73, < 0.001) vs. the CT (κ = 0.58, < 0.001; ICC = 0.61, < 0.001), in contrast to readers C and D (MRI: κ = 0.34, < 0.001; ICC = 0.42, < 0.001, and CT: κ = 0.48, < 0.001; ICC = 0.59, < 0.001). Our results indicate that the accurate diagnosis of LM of PDAC depends more on radiologic experience in MRI over CT scans.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查放射学经验对计算机断层扫描(CT)与磁共振成像(MRI)报告的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC LM)肝转移的诊断准确性的影响。包括112例临床证实为PDAC LM的患者的个人CT和MRI检查。四位经验不同的放射线医师(A> 20,B> 5,C> 1和D <1)评估了受PDAC LM影响的肝段以及每位患者发生的相关转移。比较了它们在评估节段中的敏感性和特异性。计算出每位患者被诊断为肝段的Cohen Kappa(κ)和转移性病变数目的类内相关系数(ICC)。放射科医生对CT和MRI的敏感性和特异性分别为:读者A:94.4%,90.3%和96.6%,94.8%; B-86.7%,79.7%,而83.9%,82.0%; C — 78.0%,76.7%与83.3%,78.9%和D—71.8%,79.2%与64.0%,69.5%。相比之下,审稿人A和B在MRI评估结果(κ= 0.72,<0.001; ICC = 0.73,<0.001)与CT(κ= 0.58,<0.001; ICC = 0.61,<0.001)方面达成了更大的共识。读者C和D(MRI:κ= 0.34,<0.001; ICC = 0.42,<0.001,CT:κ= 0.48,<0.001; ICC = 0.59,<0.001)。我们的结果表明,PDAC LM的准确诊断更多地取决于MRI对CT扫描的放射学经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号