首页> 外文期刊>European journal of public health >Exploring the differences in general practitioner and health care specialist utilization according to education, occupation, income and social networks across Europe: findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health
【24h】

Exploring the differences in general practitioner and health care specialist utilization according to education, occupation, income and social networks across Europe: findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health

机译:根据欧洲的教育,职业,收入和社交网络探讨一般从业者和医疗专家利用的差异:欧洲社会调查(2014年)特殊模块对健康的社会决定因素的特殊模块

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Low socioeconomic position (SEP) tends to be linked to higher use of general practitioners (GPs), while the use of health care specialists is more common in higher SEPs. Despite extensive literature in this area, previous studies have, however, only studied health care use by income or education. The aim of this study is, therefore, to examine inequalities in GP and health care specialist use by four social markers that may be linked to health care utilization (educational level, occupational status, level of financial strain and size and frequency of social networks) across 20 European countries and Israel. Methods: Logistic regression models were employed using data from the seventh round of the European Social Survey; this study focused upon people aged 25-75 years, across 21 countries. Health care utilization was measured according to self-reported use of GP or specialist care within 12 months. Analyses tested four social markers: income (financial strain), occupational status, education and social networks. Results: We observed a cross-national tendency that countries with higher or equal probability of GP utilization by lower SEP groups had a more consistent probability of specialist use among high SEP groups. Moreover, countries with inequalities in GP use in favour of high SEP groups had comparable levels of inequalities in specialist care utilization. This was the case for three social markers (education, occupational class and social networks), while the pattern was less pronounced for income (financial strain). Conclusion: There are significant inequalities associated with GP and specialist health care use across Europe-with higher SEP groups more likely to use health care specialists, compared with lower SEP groups. In the context of health care specialist use, education and occupation appear to be particularly important factors.
机译:背景:低社会经济地位(SEP)往往与普通从业者(GPS)的更高利用相关联,而医疗保健专家的使用在更高的SEP中更常见。尽管该地区具有广泛的文学,但之前的研究只有在收入或教育中研究了医疗保健使用。因此,本研究的目的是审查GP和医疗保健专家的不平等,这些社会标志可能与医疗保健利用(教育水平,职业状况,财务状况,财务水平和社交网络规模和频率水平)相关联跨越20个欧洲国家和以色列。方法:使用来自欧洲欧洲社会调查的第七轮数据的数据采用逻辑回归模型;本研究专注于25-75岁的人,超过21个国家。根据自我报告的GP或专业护理在12个月内根据自我报告使用来测量医疗利用。分析测试了四个社会标志:收入(金融应变),职业地位,教育和社交网络。结果:我们观察到跨国趋势,低九期群体具有更高或相同的GP利用概率的国家在高分子组中具有更一致的专业使用概率。此外,GP的不平等国家使用的国家有利于高素质的群体具有可比专业护理利用的不平等水平。这是三个社会标志(教育,职业阶级和社交网络)的情况,而这些模式对于收入不太明显(财务压力)。结论:与GP和专业医疗用途有关的显着不平等性 - 与较低的SEP组相比,欧洲对欧洲的专业医疗保健用途更有可能使用医疗专家。在医疗保健专家使用的背景下,教育和职业似乎是特别重要的因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European journal of public health》 |2017年第1期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Norwegian Univ Sci &

    Technol Dept Sociol &

    Polit Sci POB 7491 Trondheim Norway;

    Norwegian Univ Sci &

    Technol Dept Sociol &

    Polit Sci POB 7491 Trondheim Norway;

    Norwegian Univ Sci &

    Technol Dept Sociol &

    Polit Sci POB 7491 Trondheim Norway;

    Univ Durham Sch Med Pharm &

    Hlth Div Pharm Queens Campus Stockton On Tees England;

    Norwegian Univ Sci &

    Technol Dept Sociol &

    Polit Sci POB 7491 Trondheim Norway;

    Norwegian Univ Sci &

    Technol Dept Sociol &

    Polit Sci POB 7491 Trondheim Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 流行病学与防疫;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号