5.4-O1Categorizing “race”, “ethnicity”, and “migration status” in clinical research. Challenges, pitfalls, and justifications from an ethical perspective

DDrewniak; TKrones; VWild

首页> 外文期刊>European journal of public health >5.4-O1Categorizing “race”, “ethnicity”, and “migration status” in clinical research. Challenges, pitfalls, and justifications from an ethical perspective

【24h】

5.4-O1Categorizing “race”, “ethnicity”, and “migration status” in clinical research. Challenges, pitfalls, and justifications from an ethical perspective

机译：5.4-O1类“种族”，“种族”和“迁移状态”在临床研究中。挑战，陷阱和道德观点的理由

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《European journal of public health》 |2018年第1期|共1页
作者
DDrewniak; TKrones; VWild;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类流行病学与防疫;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-20 02:49:42

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. 5.4-O1Categorizing “race”, “ethnicity”, and “migration status” in clinical research. Challenges, pitfalls, and justifications from an ethical perspective [J] . DDrewniak, TKrones, VWild European journal of public health . 2018,第Suppla1期

机译：5.4-O1类“种族”，“种族”和“迁移状态”在临床研究中。挑战，陷阱和道德观点的理由
2. Ethical justification for human stem cell research. The view of the German Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research. [J] . Siep L Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz . 2008,第9期

机译：人类干细胞研究的道德依据。德国中央干细胞研究伦理委员会的观点。
3. Ethical justification for human stem cell research. The view of the German Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research. [J] . Siep L Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz . 2008,第9期

机译：人类干细胞研究的道德依据。德国中央干细胞研究伦理委员会的观点。
4. Risk and resilience: children's perspectives through drawings on parent's economical migration and ethnicity [C] . Micu-Serbu I. B., Gafencu M., Nyiredi A., World Congress on Resilience. . 2014

机译：风险和恢复力：儿童通过父母经济迁移和种族的图纸的观点
5. The Role of Ethical Leadership in the Clinical Decision Making of Physical Therapists in Caring for Patients of Differing Socioeconomic Status and Race with Low Back Pain in the United States [D] . Griech, Sean F. 2020

机译：道德领导力在不同社会经济地位和腰痛患者照顾患者的临床决策中的作用
6. Perspectives on the ethical concerns and justifications of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing: HIV screening policy changes [O] . Michael J Waxman, Roland C Merchant, M Teresa Celada, 2013

机译：关于2006年疾病控制和预防中心HIV测试的伦理关注和理由的观点：HIV筛查政策的变化
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考
8. Applying Tactical Resources Against Strategic Challenges: The Ethical Pitfalls of MEDCAPs as an Instrument of National Policy [R] . Hicks, D. C. 2010

机译：应用战术资源应对战略挑战：mEDCap作为国家政策工具的伦理陷阱

5.4-O1Categorizing “race”, “ethnicity”, and “migration status” in clinical research. Challenges, pitfalls, and justifications from an ethical perspective

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅