Comparing the Nomological Networks of the Big Five and HEXACO Models

摘要

Omnibus assertions whether the Big Five (B5) or HEXACO models are "better" fall short. We argue it is more important to determine their (boundaries of) usefulness and propose a nomological network approach (NNA) to systematically compare trait structure models in a common framework. We illustrate how the NNA can be deployed to address several objections mentioned by Ashton and Lee's (2020a) target article. Further, we outline how the NNA may provide conceptual clarity and facilitate the integration of personality dimensions outside the five-factor space. (C) 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology