首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Can group incentives alleviate moral hazard? The role of pro-social preferences
【24h】

Can group incentives alleviate moral hazard? The role of pro-social preferences

机译:团体激励可以缓解道德危害吗? 亲社交偏好的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Incentivizing unobservable effort in risky environments, such as in insurance, credit, and labor markets, is vital as moral hazard may otherwise cause significant welfare losses including the outright failure of markets. Ensuring incentive -compatibility through state contingent contracts between principal and agent, however, is undesirable for risk-averse agents. We provide a theoretical intuition on how pro-social preferences between agents in a joint liability group contract.can ensure incentive-compatibility. Two independent largescale behavioral experiments framed in an insurance context support the hypotheses derived from our theory. In particular, effort decreases when making agents' payoff less state dependent, but this effect is mitigated with joint liability in a group scheme where agents are additionally motivated by pro-social concerns. Activating strategic motives slightly increases effort further; particularly in non-anonymous groups with high network strength. The results support existing evidence on joint liability groups and further suggest that even if peer pressure to ensure effort provision is absent, such group policies can improve efficiency when agents are pro-social. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在风险环境中激励不可观察的努力,例如保险,信贷和劳动力市场,这是道德危害可能否则造成显着福利损失,包括彻底失败的市场。确保通过校长和代理人之间的国家或职业合同来确保奖励是不希望的风险厌恶代理人。我们为联合责任集团合同之间的代理商之间提供了理论直观.CAN确保激励兼容性。在保险背景中构建的两个独立的大型行为实验支持从我们理论中得出的假设。特别是,在使代理人的收益较少依赖的代理人的回报时,努力会减少,但这种效应在组织方案中具有联合责任,其中代理人通过亲社会问题的担忧。激活战略动机进一步增加努力;特别是在具有高网络强度的非匿名组中。结果支持有关联合责任小组的现有证据,进一步建议,即使确保缺席的同行压力,此类政策可以提高效率,当代理商是社会社会时。 (c)2017 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号