首页> 外文期刊>Educational psychology review >How Much Mightier Is the Pen than the Keyboard for Note-Taking? A Replication and Extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014)
【24h】

How Much Mightier Is the Pen than the Keyboard for Note-Taking? A Replication and Extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014)

机译:笔的键盘比键盘为键盘,更强大的是多少? 穆勒和oppenheimer的复制和延伸(2014)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many students use laptops to take notes in classes, but does using them impact later test performance? In a high-profile investigation comparing note-taking writing on paper versus typing on a laptop keyboard, Mueller and Oppenheimer (Psychological Science, 25, 1159-1168, 2014) concluded that taking notes by longhand is superior. We conducted a direct replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) and extended their work by including groups who took notes using eWriters and who did not take notes. Some trends suggested longhand superiority; however, performance did not consistently differ between any groups (experiments 1 and 2), including a group who did not take notes (experiment 2). Group differences were further decreased after students studied their notes (experiment 2). A meta-analysis (combining direct replications) of test performance revealed small (nonsignificant) effects favoring longhand. Based on the present outcomes and other available evidence, concluding which method is superior for improving the functions of note-taking seems premature.
机译:许多学生使用笔记本电脑在课堂上采取笔记,但是使用它们会影响到以后的测试性能吗?在一个高调的调查中,比较笔记纸上的笔记本与笔记本电脑键盘,穆勒和oppenheimer(心理学科学,25,1159-1168,2014)的结论是,通过龙手的票据是优越的。我们对Mueller和Oppenheimer进行了直接复制(2014年),并通过包括使用电子商人扣除笔记的团体来扩展工作,并没有记笔记。一些趋势建议了长手优势;然而,任何群体(实验1和2)之间的性能并不一致,包括没有注意笔记的组(实验2)。学生研究说明后,群体差异进一步下降(实验2)。测试性能的荟萃分析(结合直接复制)揭示了龙手的小(不显着)的影响。基于现在的结果和其他可用证据,结论是哪种方法优于改善笔记采取的功能似乎早熟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号