...
首页> 外文期刊>Echocardiography. >ADAM ADAM ‐C score: New risk score for predicting diagnostic yield of transesophageal echocardiography after cerebral ischemia
【24h】

ADAM ADAM ‐C score: New risk score for predicting diagnostic yield of transesophageal echocardiography after cerebral ischemia

机译:ADAM ADAM -C得分:用于预测脑缺血后经细胞异常超声心动图的诊断产量的新风险分数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and aim The clinical utility of transesophageal echocardiography ( TEE ) after brain ischemia ( BI ) remains a matter of debate. We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of TEE and to build a score that could help physicians to identify which patients should better benefit from TEE . Methods This prospective, multicenter, observational study included patients over 18?years old, hospitalized for BI . TEE findings were judged discriminant if the results showed important information leading to major changes in the management of patients. Most patients with patent foramen ovale were excluded. Variables independently associated with a discriminant TEE were used to build the prediction model. Results Of the entire population (1479 patients), 255 patients (17%) were classified in the discriminant TEE group. Five parameters were selected as predictors of a discriminant TEE . Accordingly, the ADAM ‐C score could be calculated as follows: Score?=?4 (if age ≥60)?+?2 (if diabetes)?+?2 (if aortic stenosis from any degrees)?+?1 (if multi‐territory stroke)?+?2 (if history of coronary artery disease). At a threshold lower than 3, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value ( NPV ) of detecting discriminant TEE were 88% (95% CI 85–90), 44% (95% CI 41–47), 21% (95% CI 19–27), and 95% (95% CI 94–97), respectively. Conclusion A simple score based on clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters can help physicians to identify patients who might not benefit from TEE . Indeed, a score lower than 3 has an interesting NPV of 95% (95% CI 94–97).
机译:背景和旨在脑缺血(BI)后经医学超声心动图(TEE)的临床用途仍然是辩论问题。我们的目标是评估TEE的临床影响并建立一个可以帮助医生识别哪些患者应该从T恤中获得更好的患者的分数。方法这一前瞻性,多中心,观测性研究包括18岁以上的患者,为BI住院治疗。如果结果表明了导致患者管理的重大变化的重要信息,TEE调查结果判断判别。大多数患有专利植物卵巢的患者被排除在外。与判别TEA独立相关的变量用于构建预测模型。整个人口的结果(1479名患者),255名患者(17%)被分类为判别TEE集团。选择五个参数作为判别T恤的预测因子。因此,ADAM -C分数可以如下计算:得分?=?4(如果≥60岁)?+?2(如果糖尿病)?+?2(如果任何程度的主动脉狭窄)?+?1(如果多领域行程)?+?2(如果冠状动脉疾病的历史)。在低于3的阈值下,检测判别TEE的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值(NPV)为88%(95%CI 85-90),44%(95%CI 41-47), 21%(95%CI 19-27)和95%(95%CI 94-97)。结论基于临床和经线超声心动图参数的简单分数可以帮助医生识别可能无法从T恤中受益的患者。实际上,低于3的得分具有95%的有趣NPV(95%CI 94-97)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号