首页> 外文期刊>Ecography >Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co-occurrence
【24h】

Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co-occurrence

机译:解散生物互动,环境过滤器和分散限制作为物种的司机共同发生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A key focus in ecology is to search for community assembly rules. Here we compare two community modelling frameworks that integrate a combination of environmental and spatial data to identify positive and negative species associations from presence-absence matrices, and incorporate an additional comparison using joint species distribution models (JSDM). The frameworks use a dichotomous logic tree that distinguishes dispersal limitation, environmental requirements, and interspecific interactions as causes of segregated or aggregated species pairs. The first framework is based on a classical null model analysis complemented by tests of spatial arrangement and environmental characteristics of the sites occupied by the members of each species pair (Classic framework). The second framework, (SDM framework) implemented here for the first time, builds on the application of environmentally-constrained null models (or JSDMs) to partial out the influence of the environment, and includes an analysis of the geographical configuration of species ranges to account for dispersal effects. We applied these approaches to examine plot-level species co-occurrence in plant communities sampled along a wide elevation gradient in the Swiss Alps. According to the frameworks, the majority of species pairs were randomly associated, and most of the non-random positive and negative species associations could be attributed to environmental filtering and/or dispersal limitation. These patterns were partly detected also with JSDM. Biotic interactions were detected more frequently in the SDM framework, and by JSDM, than in the Classic framework. All approaches detected species aggregation more often than segregation, perhaps reflecting the important role of facilitation in stressful high-elevation environments. Differences between the frameworks may reflect the explicit incorporation of elevational segregation in the SDM framework and the sensitivity of JSDM to the environmental data. Nevertheless,
机译:生态学的关键侧重于搜索社区汇编规则。在这里,我们比较了两个社区建模框架,该框架集成了环境和空间数据的组合,以识别来自存在性缺失矩阵的正种和否定物种关联,并使用关节物种分布模型(JSDM)结合额外的比较。该框架使用二分逻辑树,该树区分分散限制,环境要求和间隙相互作用作为隔离或聚集物种对的原因。第一个框架基于经典的空模型分析,通过每个物种对(经典框架)占据的网站的空间排列和环境特征的测试辅成额外的额为互相模型分析。第一次在此实现的第二框架(SDM框架)构建在环境约束的空模型(或JSDMS)的应用中,以部分地淘汰环境的影响,并且包括对物种范围的地理配置的分析考虑分散效应。我们应用了这些方法来检查沿瑞士阿尔卑斯山脉沿着广阔的高程梯度进行采样的植物社区中的情节级物种共同发生。根据框架,大多数物种对随机相关,大多数非随机阳性和阴性物种关联可能归因于环境过滤和/或分散限制。这些模式也与JSDM部分检测到。在SDM框架中更频繁地检测到生物相互作用,并通过JSDM在经典框架中检测到。所有接近的方法比分离更频繁地检测到物种聚集,也许反映了便利化在压力高度高度环境中的重要作用。框架之间的差异可能反映了SDM框架中的高度隔离的显式融合和JSDM对环境数据的敏感性。尽管如此,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号