首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless?) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM?) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results
【24h】

A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless?) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM?) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results

机译:对单切口无需的随机比较(可针剂 - 无需?)迷你吊带与内输出转基因仪(Contaulure-Kim?)中尿道患者中尿道尿失禁:24个月的后续结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction and hypothesis There is a shortage of reliable data on the efficiency of the under-investigated mini-slings to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of the single-incision needleless mini-sling (SIMS) with the transobturator inside-out mid-urethral sling (TOT). Materials and methods Two hundred one women with clinically proven SUI were included in this single-center prospective randomized trial. The patients were randomly allocated to the groups. All surgeries were done by the same single surgeon. Examinations were done by one other blinded surgeon. The patients were followed up for 24 months. Objective cure was defined as the absence of SUI and negative cough-stress test. Subjective cure was defined as no stress leakage of urine after surgery in a validated questionnaire. Failure of the surgery was defined as the need for reoperation. Every complaint was categorized by the IUGA/ICS Classification of Prosthesis-related Complications. Results The objective (85.4% versus 89.9%, p ?=?0.362) and subjective (87.6% versus 89.9%, p ?=?0.636) cure rates were similar with the TOT and SIMS at the postoperative month 24, respectively. The mesh exposure ≤ 1?cm rate was 3.4% for both groups, and the mesh exposure > 1?cm rate was 2.2% for both groups. Overall failure rates were 3.4% and 2.2% for the TOT and SIMS group, respectively. No viscus organ perforation was noted. Complications with the SIMS procedure were less painful compared with TOT ( p ?=?0.024). Conclusions Single-incision needleless mini-slings exhibited similar cure rates as the trans-obturator mid-urethral slings from both the patient and clinician points of view in 24?months of follow-up. Mini-slings resulted in significantly less postoperative pain than trans-obturator mid-urethral slings.
机译:介绍和假设有缺乏关于受调查的迷你吊索的效率的可靠数据,以治疗压力尿失禁(SUI)。我们的旨在将单切口无需迷你吊带(SIMS)的有效性与转基团中的中尿道吊索(TOT)进行比较。材料和方法二百个患有临床验证的SUI的女性被纳入了这项单中心前瞻性随机试验中。将患者随机分配给组。所有手术机构都是由同一个外科医生完成的。考试由另一个盲目的外科医生完成。患者进行了24个月。客观固化被定义为缺乏SUI和负咳嗽应激试验。主观固化在经过验证的问卷中的手术后没有尿液的压力泄漏。手术失败被定义为重新进食的必要性。每次投诉都由朱氏菌/ ICS与假肢相关的并发症分类进行分类。结果目标(85.4%,P?= 0.362)和主观(87.6%对89.9%,P?= 0.636)治愈率分别与术后第24个月的TOT和SIM。两组的网状曝光≤1Ωcm速率为3.4%,两组的网状曝光> 1·cm速率为2.2%。对于TOT和SIMS组,总体故障率分别为3.4%和2.2%。没有注意到没有内风器官穿孔。与小孩相比,SIMS程序的并发症较小(P?= 0.024)。结论单切口无需迷你吊索表现出类似的固化率作为患者和临床医生观点的逆滤压中尿道曲线在24个月的后续行动中。迷你吊索导致术后姿势明显不如反闭合剂中尿道曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号