首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Biomechanical evaluation of distal biceps tendon repair using tension slide technique and knotless fixation technique
【24h】

Biomechanical evaluation of distal biceps tendon repair using tension slide technique and knotless fixation technique

机译:使用张力滑动技术和结固定技术进行远端二头肌肌腱修复的生物力学评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Background Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures are uncommon injuries that often affect young active males, typically resulting from an eccentric load on their dominant extremity. The purpose of this study was to compare pullout strength and tendon gapping in the tension slide technique (TST) versus a knotless fixation technique (KFT). Methods Two sets of experiments were performed using cadaveric elbow specimens. In the first experiment, eight elbows from different cadavers were tested to compare TST with a standard locking whipstitch with KFT, four elbows in each group, using a standard locking whipstitch. In the second experiment, 12 elbows were used to study the differences between TST with a standard locking whipstitch with KFT using suture tape reinforced whipstitch (RKFT), using the TST data from the first and second experiment. Each experiment evaluated gapping after cyclic loading and the second experiment also tested the construct to load to failure. Results Gapping for KFT with a standard locking whipstitch was 10.64?mm versus 2.69?mm for the TST after 1000?cycles ( P ?=?0.016). A reinforced whipstitch significantly improved the failure to gap on the KFT with no significant difference in gapping when compared to TST after 3000?cycles ( P ?=?0.36). The resultant gapping for TST and KST was 2.08?mm and 2.99?mm ( P ?=?0.91), respectively. Load to failure for TST and KFT were 282?Nm and 328?Nm ( P ?=?0.20), respectively. Conclusion Bone-tendon gap resistance of a KFT repair of a torn distal biceps tendon is limited by suture technique. Using a tape reinforced locking whipstitch, the repair is as strong as TST repair. Levels of Evidence : Basic Science.
机译:摘要背景急性远端二头肌肌腱破裂是罕见的伤害,通常会影响年轻的活性雄性,通常是由其主导末端的偏心载荷引起的。本研究的目的是比较张力滑动技术(TST)中的拉伸强度和肌腱间隙,而无变形固定技术(KFT)。方法采用尸体弯头标本进行两组实验。在第一个实验中,测试了来自不同尸体的八个肘部,以将TST与每个组中的标准锁定灯管,每个组中的四个肘部,使用标准锁定灯管。在第二个实验中,使用来自第一和第二实验的TST数据,使用带有KFT的标准锁定灯管与kft的标准锁定灯管与kft,使用来自第一和第二实验的TST数据的标准锁定灯管的差异。循环加载后的每个实验评估了间隙,第二个实验还测试了构建体以加载到故障。结果用标准锁定灯管敲击KFT为10.64?mm对2.69?mm在1000后的tst?循环(p?= 0.016)。与3000后的TST相比,加强次鞭炮在KFT上显着改善了KFT对KFT的间隙没有显着差异(P?= 0.36)。 TST和KST所得到的间隙分别为2.08Ωmm和2.99?mm(p?= 0.91)。 TST和KFT的负载分别为282Ω·nm和328?nm(p?= 0.20)。结论撕裂远端二头肌肌腱的KFT修复的骨肌腱间隙抗性受缝合技术的限制。使用胶带加强锁定灯管,修复与TST修复一样强。证据水平:基础科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号