首页> 外文期刊>International surgery >Examination of the Relationship Between Postoperative Quality of Life and Gastric Emptying Function After Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy and Distal Gastrectomy
【24h】

Examination of the Relationship Between Postoperative Quality of Life and Gastric Emptying Function After Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy and Distal Gastrectomy

机译:幽门保护术后胃切除术后胃灭放功能与胃排空功能的关系检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare postoperative quality of life (QOL) of patients with early cancer of the body of the stomach who were treated with pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) and those treated with distal gastrectomy (DGR), and to evaluate the relationship between postoperative QOL and gastric emptying function (GEF). Patients with early cancer of the body of the stomach are often treated with PPG to preserve gastric function, and their QOL appears to be better after PPG than after DGR. Differences in postoperative GEF are thought to be a factor, but the relationship between GEF and postoperative QOL has not been well investigated. A total of 60 patients [23 PPG and 37 DGR (Billroth I)] completed QOL surveys [SF-36, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)] and underwent 13 C-breath tests to evaluate GEF in two groups (<= 12 months postoperatively and >12 months postoperatively). The time until the percentage of breath (CO2)-C-13 reaches a peak during the C-13-breath test (Tmax), which is an index of gastric emptying velocity, was evaluated. For the SF-36, there were no significant differences between the two procedures. For GSRS, a trend toward better scores was seen after PPG; abdominal pain and total scores at >12 months postoperatively were significantly better with PPG. Tmax was significantly longer for PPG patients. For each procedure, symptoms significantly worsened when Tmax was >21 minutes at >12 months after surgery. Although postoperative GEF evaluated by (13) C-breath tests did not affect overall QOL measured by the SF-36, it did affect disease-specific QOL measured by GSRS.
机译:本研究的目的是将患者的患者的术后性质(QOL)与幽门植物保存的胃切除术(PPG)和远端胃切除术(DGR)处理的患者进行比较,并评估术后QOL与胃排空功能(GEF)的关系。早期癌症的患者通常用PPG治疗以保持胃功能,并且在PPG之后,它们的QOL似乎比DGR在DGR之后更好。术后GEF的差异被认为是一个因素,但全球环境基金和术后QOL之间的关系尚未得到很好的调查。共有60名患者[23 ppg和37 dgr(billroth i)]完成了QOL调查[SF-36,胃肠道症状评级秤(GSRS)]和接受了13个C呼吸测试,以评估两组内的GEF(<= 12个月术后和> 12个月术后)。评估呼吸百分比(CO2)-C-13达到峰值的时间,这是胃排空速度指数的C-13呼气试验(Tmax)。对于SF-36,两种程序之间没有显着差异。对于GSRS来说,PPG后看到了更好分数的趋势;腹痛和术后12个月的总分数与PPG明显更好。 PPG患者TMAX显着更长。对于每种程序,当TMAX> 21分钟>手术后12个月时,症状显着恶化。虽然术后GEF(13)C-Seast试验没有影响SF-36测量的整体QoL,但它确实影响了GSR测量的疾病特异性QoL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号