首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Performability Engineering >Question-based Methodology for Rating the Severity of Defects in Construction Through on-Site Inspection
【24h】

Question-based Methodology for Rating the Severity of Defects in Construction Through on-Site Inspection

机译:基于问题的方法,用于通过现场检查评估建设缺陷的严重程度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The impact of defects in construction is still not well-defined, and it is challenging to quantify all related indirect variables numerically. The majority of the studies in this field focus on the direct impact of defects on costs and planning, neglecting other indirect impacts that are more difficult lo measure. Hence, it is vital to evaluate and classify the defects based on their impact. so that priorities can be defined for action both in their correction and prevention. In this work, a generalized methodology to grade the severity of defects was developed based on five impacts: impact on costs, planning, health and safety, system performance, and subsequent tasks. A suitable variant of failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was selected in order to develop a qualitative analysis methodology to grade the impact factors, severity, and risk prior number (RPN) of defects, based on question forms. Moreover, the presented methodology was applied on-site and compared with FMEA traditional severity calculations applied in the same construction project by the same individuals evaluating the same severity of defects. The obtained results from both methodologies were slightly different, and the authors believe that the identified tendency of different severity levels between both calculations could lead to different risk categories when applied to the whole project. Moreover, it is expected that the proposed methodology can also help separate the impacts for an individual evaluation of the defects.
机译:施工中缺陷的影响仍然没有明确定义,并且在数值上量化所有相关的间接变量有挑战性。这一领域的大多数研究侧重于直接影响缺陷对成本和规划的影响,忽视了更困难的衡量标准的其他间接影响。因此,根据其影响,评估和分类缺陷至关重要。因此,可以在其校正和预防方面定义优先级。在这项工作中,通过五次影响,开发了一般性的方法来缩放缺陷的严重程度:对成本,规划,健康和安全,系统性能和后续任务的影响。选择了合适的失效模式和效果分析(FMEA),以便基于问题表格制定定性分析方法以评估缺陷的影响因素,严重程度和预先数(RPN)的缺陷。此外,本发明的方法是在现场应用的,并与在同一构建项目中应用的FMEA传统严重程度计算,同一个体评估相同的缺陷严重程度。两种方法的所得结果略有不同,作者认为,在适用于整个项目时,两次计算之间的不同严重程度水平的识别趋势可能导致不同的风险类别。此外,预期建议的方法还可以帮助分离个人评估缺陷的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号