...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of medical genetics, Part A >Gratitude, protective buffering, and cognitive dissonance: How families respond to pediatric whole exome sequencing in the absence of actionable results
【24h】

Gratitude, protective buffering, and cognitive dissonance: How families respond to pediatric whole exome sequencing in the absence of actionable results

机译:感谢,保护缓冲和认知不和谐:家庭在没有可操作的结果的情况下如何应对小儿全部exome测序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) may identify variants leading to targeted management of existing conditions. Yet, CGES often fails to identify pathogenic diagnostic variants and introduces uncertainties by detecting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and secondary findings. This study investigated how families understand findings and adjust their perspectives on CGES. As part of NIH's Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium, children were recruited from clinics at the Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania (CHOP) and offered exome sequencing. Primary pathogenic and possibly pathogenic, and some secondary findings were returned. Investigators digitally recorded results disclosure sessions and conducted 3‐month follow up interviews with 10 adolescents and a parent. An interdisciplinary team coded all transcripts. Participants were initially disappointed with findings, yet reactions evolved within disclosure sessions and at 3‐month interviews toward acceptance and satisfaction. Families erroneously expected, and prepared extensively, to learn about risk for common conditions. During disclosure sessions, parents and adolescents varied in how they monitored and responded to each others reactions. Several misinterpreted, or overestimated, the utility of findings to attribute meaning and achieve closure for the CGES experience. Participants perceived testing as an opportunity to improve disease management despite results that did not introduce new treatments or diagnoses. Future research may examine whether families experience cognitive dissonance regarding discrepancies between expectations and findings, and how protective buffering minimizes the burden of disappointment on loved ones. As CGES is increasingly integrated into clinical care providers must contend with tempering family expectations and interpretations of findings while managing complex medical care.
机译:临床基因组和exome测序(CIGE)可以识别导致目标条件的有针对性管理的变体。然而,CIGE经常未能鉴定病原诊断变体,并通过检测不确定意义(VUS)和二次结果的变体来引入不确定性。本研究调查了家庭如何了解调查结果并调整其视角。作为NIH的临床测序探索性研究财团的一部分,儿童被招募了宾夕法尼亚州宾夕法尼亚州儿童医院(CHOP)的诊所,并提供了Exome测序。原发性致病性和可能致病性,并返回一些二次结果。调查人员数字录制结果披露会议,并进行了3个月的跟进10名青少年和父母的采访。跨学科团队编码了所有成绩单。参与者最初对调查结果感到失望,但在披露会议和3个月的接受接受和满足的面试中进化的反应。家庭错误地预期,广泛准备,了解常见条件的风险。在披露期间,父母和青少年在他们如何监测和响应彼此的反应中变化。几个误解,或高估了调查结果的效用,以造成意义并实现折刀经验的关闭。参与者认为测试作为改善疾病管理的机会,尽管结果没有引入新的治疗或诊断。未来的研究可能会检查家庭是否会对期望和调查结果之间的差异进行认知不和谐,以及保护性缓冲如何最大限度地减少对所属人失望的负担。随着仰卧期越来越纳入临床护理,提供者必须与在管理复杂的医疗保健时争夺调查的家庭期望和调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号