...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics >Comparison of approaches to weighting of multiple criteria for selecting equipment to optimize performance and safety
【24h】

Comparison of approaches to weighting of multiple criteria for selecting equipment to optimize performance and safety

机译:选择设备优化性能和安全性的多种标准加权方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Nowadays every piece of working equipment and tools has to comply with safety standards and laws. This study investigated multi-criteria methods for selecting working equipment in order to optimize performance and occupational safety. The multi-criteria decision-making (MDCM) method was applied to the problem of selecting optimal working equipment using four different criterion weighting approaches (direct weighting, revised Simos procedure, Fuller's triangle and analytic hierarchy process). Groups of economic, technical and safety criteria were defined and five weighting scenarios were developed. Although the four weighting methods produced similar results, in some situations they produced different criterion weighting factors. The final output of the MCDM method was the identification of the optimal forklift in the five weighting scenarios. Although we have applied the MCDM method to a forklift selection problem, it can be applied to all sorts of working equipment in contexts where economic, technical and safety selection criteria can be identified.
机译:如今,每一块工作设备和工具都必须遵守安全标准和法律。本研究研究了选择工作设备的多标准方法,以优化性能和职业安全。应用多标准决策(MDCM)方法应用于使用四种不同的标准加权方法选择最佳工作设备的问题(直接加权,修订的SIMOS程序,富勒的三角形和分析层次结构)。定义了经济,技术和安全标准组,开发了五种加权情景。虽然四种加权方法产生了类似的结果,但在一些情况下它们产生了不同的标准加权因子。 MCDM方法的最终输出是在五种加权方案中识别最佳叉车。虽然我们已将MCDM方法应用于叉车选择问题,但它可以应用于可以识别经济,技术和安全选择标准的上下文中的各种工作设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号