...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications >Sentiment analysis: an empirical comparison between various training algorithms for artificial neural network
【24h】

Sentiment analysis: an empirical comparison between various training algorithms for artificial neural network

机译:情绪分析:人工神经网络各种训练算法的实证比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The proliferated increase in the commercial benefits of sentiment analysis accumulated a huge interest in the domain of sentiment classification. Sentiment analysis categorises a given text into positive or negative class. In this paper, we present an empirical comparison between different training algorithms gradient descent (GD), gradient descent with momentum backpropagation (GDM), gradient descent adaptive learning rate backpropagation (GDA), gradient descent with momentum and adaptive learning rate backpropagation (GDX), and Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation (LM), used for training the neural network for the domain of sentiment classification. The performance of all the methods is compared and evaluated using three balanced binary datasets from various domains with different features using various performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, f -score, mean squared error, and training time. The experiments are performed five times with different random seed values using 10-fold cross-validation. The results indicate that GDX and LM outperform other methods in terms of classification accuracy.
机译:情绪分析的商业益处的增殖增加累积了对情绪分类领域的巨大兴趣。情绪分析将给定文本分为正面或负类。在本文中,我们在不同训练算法梯度下降(GD)之间的经验比较,梯度下降,梯度逆转(GDM),梯度下降自适应学习速率反向化(GDA),梯度下降,具有动量和自适应学习率反向化(GDX)和Levenberg-Marquardt BackPropagation(LM),用于培训神经网络的情绪分类领域。比较所有方法的性能,并使用具有不同特征的三个平衡二进制数据集进行比较和评估,使用不同的特征,例如精度,精度,召回,f -score,均方的误差和训练时间。使用10倍交叉验证,实验用不同的随机种子值进行五次。结果表明,在分类准确性方面,GDX和LM优于其他方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号