首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Epidemiology: Official Journal of the International Epidemiological Association >The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?
【24h】

The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?

机译:群组多次随机对照试验设计:务实试验有效,有效的替代品吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)-the gold standard for evaluating the effects of medical interventions-are notoriously challenging in terms of logistics, planning and costs. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial approach is designed to facilitate randomized trials for pragmatic evaluation of (new) interventions and is a promising variation from conventional pragmatic RCTs. In this paper, we evaluate methodological challenges of conducting an RCT within a cohort. We argue that equally valid results can be obtained from trials conducted within cohorts as from pragmatic RCTs. However, whether this design is more efficient compared with conducting a pragmatic RCT depends on the amount and nature of non-compliance in the intervention arm.
机译:随机对照试验(RCT) - 评估医疗干预措施的黄金标准 - 在物流,规划和成本方面都是臭名昭着的。 队列多次随机对照试验方法旨在促进随机试验,用于务实评估(新)干预,并且是传统务实RCT的有希望的变化。 在本文中,我们评估了在队列中进行RCT的方法论挑战。 我们认为可以从副犬RCT中的群组中进行的试验中获得同样有效的结果。 然而,与进行务实的RCT相比,这种设计是否更有效地取决于干预臂中不合规的量和性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号