...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology >Comparison between aerated static piles and vermicomposting in producing co-compost from rural organic wastes and cow manure
【24h】

Comparison between aerated static piles and vermicomposting in producing co-compost from rural organic wastes and cow manure

机译:从农村有机废弃物和牛粪生产共肥料与蠕动之间的静桩与蠕动之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, the process of producing compost from rural separated solid wastes using aerated static piles (ASP) and vermicomposting was investigated which was carried out from September 2015 to January 2016. A combination of waste ingredients, conditions, processing duration, analysis of key parameters (moisture, pH, temperature and C/N ratio) governing the process, the quality of the final product and economic assessment was considered. Six piles were created in the ASP method, and six piles were loaded in vermicomposting pits in which the Eisenia foetida species was used. Three piles in each method (odd piles) contained 100% putrescible wastes, while the rest of three piles (even piles) contained 75% putrescible wastes and 25% cow dung. The total coliform reductions in both kinds of waste compositions were observed. Heavy metals such as lead, cadmium and nickel were not found in any of the piles. Comprehensive statistical analysis, including the comparison of the variables, correlation among variables and analysis of variance, was performed for the measured parameters. Comparing the final product with standards showed that composting proceeded satisfactorily in both methods. There were no issues such as bad smells or rodents during the study. An approximate chemical empirical formula calculated for the organic fraction of the composts generated in vermicompost pits and ASP was C15.1H22.4O7.7N and C15.2H21.5O14.3N, respectively. Economic assessment showed that net present value in the internal rate of return for producing compost using aerated static piles was equal to 12.4%; for vermicomposting, it was 5.4%.
机译:在这项研究中,研究了使用充气静态桩(ASP)和蠕动的农村分离的固体废物堆肥的过程于2015年9月至2016年1月进行。废物成分,条件,处理持续时间,关键分析的组合考虑了治过程的参数(湿度,pH,温度和C / N比),考虑了最终产品的质量和经济评估。在ASP方法中创建六堆,并在使用纤维组血凹坑中加载六个桩。每种方法中的三个桩(奇数桩)含有100%的腐烂废物,而剩下的三个桩(均匀)含有75%的腐烂废物和25%的牛粪。观察到两种废物组合物中的总菌落减少。在任何桩中都没有发现重金属如铅,镉和镍。综合统计分析,包括变量的比较,对测量参数进行了变量的相关性和方差分析的相关性。将最终产品与标准进行比较表明,两种方法都令人满意地进行了堆肥。在研究期间,没有诸如臭味或啮齿动物等问题。为蛭石散坑和ASP中产生的堆肥的有机分数计算的近似化学经验公式分别为C15.1H22.4O7.7N和C15.2H21.5014.3N。经济评估表明,使用充气静态桩产生堆肥的内部回报率的净目的值等于12.4%;对于蠕虫,它为5.4%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号