首页> 外文期刊>International journal of colorectal disease. >The role of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics for left-sided laparoscopic and open elective restorative colorectal surgery with and without faecal diversion
【24h】

The role of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics for left-sided laparoscopic and open elective restorative colorectal surgery with and without faecal diversion

机译:机械肠道制备和口服抗生素对左侧腹腔镜和开放式选择性恢复性结肠直肠手术的作用,无粪便转移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundThere is significant variation in the use of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics prior to left-sided elective colorectal surgery. There has been no consensus internationally.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of the 2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were divided into four groups: those who had mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone and no preparation. The main outcome measures included overall, superficial, deep and organ/space surgical site infections. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, ileus and rate of Clostridium difficile.ResultsA total of 5729 patients were included for analysis. The overall surgical site infection rate (any superficial, deep or organ/space infection) was significantly lower in the mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics approach when compared to no preparation (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.59, P0.0001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics maintained a lower risk of overall surgical site infections. MBP and OAB also had a protective effect on anastomotic leak in both the laparoscopic and open cohorts (laparoscopic multivariable adjusted OR = 0.42 (0.19-0.94), P = 0.035; open multivariable adjusted OR = 0.3 (0.12-0.77), P = 0.012). Mechanical bowel preparation alone and oral antibiotics alone was not associated with a significant decrease in surgical site infections. There was no increase in C. difficile occurrences with the use of oral antibiotics.ConclusionMechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly minimised surgical site infections and anastomotic leak following both laparoscopic and open left-sided restorative colorectal surgery. Mechanical bowel preparation alone did not reduce surgical site infections. There was a trend to reduction in surgical site infections with oral antibiotics alone.
机译:Backgroundshere是在左侧选修结直肠手术前使用机械肠道制备和口服抗生素的显着变化。 Instoonally没有共识.Hetsthis是对2015年美国外科医院国家外科州外科质量改进计划数据库的回顾性分析。患者分为四组:那些用口服抗生素的机械肠道制备的人,单独使用机械肠道制备,单独的口服抗生素并没有制备。主要的结果措施包括整体,肤浅,深和器官/空间手术部位感染。二次结果包括吻合泄漏,肝细胞和梭菌速率差异。患者总共包括5729名患者进行分析。与无制剂(或= 0.46,95%CI 0.36-0.59,P <0.0001)相比,机械肠道制备和口服抗生素接近的整体外科手术部位感染率(任何浅表深或器官/空间感染)显着降低。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,口服抗生素的机械肠道制剂保持较低的整体外科手术部位感染的风险。 MBP和OAB还对腹腔镜和开放队列的吻合泄漏的保护作用(腹腔镜多变量调节或= 0.42(0.19-0.94),P = 0.035;开放式多变量调节或= 0.3(0.12-0.77),P = 0.012 )。单独的机械肠道制备单独和口服抗生素与手术部位感染的显着降低无关。使用口服抗生素的艰难梭菌难略困难的困难。与口服抗生素的组织机械肠道准备明显最小化手术部位感染和腹腔镜和开放左侧修复结直肠手术后的吻合泄漏。单独的机械肠道制剂没有减少手术部位感染。单独使用口服抗生素的手术部位感染有一种趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号