首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Sensitivity of summer precipitation in regional spectral model simulations over eastern China to physical schemes: Daily, extreme and diurnal cycle
【24h】

Sensitivity of summer precipitation in regional spectral model simulations over eastern China to physical schemes: Daily, extreme and diurnal cycle

机译:东部地区夏季降水夏季降水对物理方案的敏感性:日,极值和昼夜周期

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, the capability of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Regional Spectral Model (RSM) in reproducing the precipitation in eastern China is evaluated with the simulation of 25-year (1983-2007) summertime climate driven by the NCEP-Department of Energy reanalysis. The impacts of different physical schemes on daily precipitation, diurnal cycle and precipitation extremes are studied through detailed analyses. The results show that the RSM model can reproduce the precipitation characteristics over eastern China, and the results are sensitive to the internal model physics and spectral nudging method. The cloud water prediction scheme of CLD3 (CLDn, the cloud schemes, classified according to the complexity microphysical processes) and the modified version of the Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF2) tend to overestimate the summer precipitation by reproducing higher humidity, while the CLD1 and the Relaxed Arakawa Schubert scheme (RAS) always underestimate it. It is also demonstrated that RSM has the capability to reproduce the spatial distributions of the extreme precipitation intensity and duration. The physical schemes have great impact on the simulations of extreme precipitation over eastern China, especially on regional scales. For the diurnal cycle of precipitation, the responses of the simulated amplitude to the physical schemes differ with regions. The RAS scheme underestimates the amplitudes over southeastern China, while the KF2 generates positive biases. The involving of the scale selective bias correction (SSBC) method can properly improve the simulated mean precipitation and diurnal cycle of summer precipitation. However, it shows lower skill in improving extreme precipitation indices over eastern China, especially in the experiments with CLD3 scheme. In summary, the selection of CLD1 and KF2 scheme, involving SSBC method performs better than the other experiments.
机译:在这项研究中,通过由NCEP驱动的25年(1983-2007)夏季气候的模拟评估了国家环境预测(NCEP)区域谱模型(RSM)的国家环境预测中心(NCEP)区域谱模型(RSM)的能力。能量再分析。通过详细分析研究了不同物理方案对日降水,昼夜循环和降水极值的影响。结果表明,RSM模型可以重现中国东部的降水特征,结果对内部模型物理和光谱闪烁法敏感。 CLD3(CLDN,根据复杂性微微物理过程分类的CLDN,云方案)的云水预测方案和Kain-Fritce方案(KF2)的改进版本倾向于通过再现更高的湿度来高估夏季沉淀,而CLD1和轻松的Arakawa Schubert计划(RAS)总是低估它。还证明RSM具有再现极端降水强度和持续时间的空间分布的能力。物理方案对中国东部的极端降水模拟产生了很大影响,特别是在区域尺度上。对于降水的昼夜循环,模拟幅度与物理方案的响应与区域不同。 RAS方案低估了中国东南部的幅度,而KF2则产生正偏见。规模选择性偏压(SSBC)方法的涉及可以正确改善夏季降水的模拟平均沉淀和昼夜周期。然而,它表明了改善东部地区极端降水指数的技能,特别是在CLD3计划的实验中。总之,CLD1和KF2方案的选择,涉及SSBC方法的表现优于其他实验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号