首页> 外文期刊>International endodontic journal >Efficacy of chlorhexidine as a final irrigant in one‐visit root canal treatment: a prospective comparative study
【24h】

Efficacy of chlorhexidine as a final irrigant in one‐visit root canal treatment: a prospective comparative study

机译:氯己定作为一次访问根管治疗中的最终灌溉剂的疗效:一项前瞻性比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aim To evaluate postoperative pain and radiographic evidence of periapical healing in teeth with apical periodontitis treated in one visit with an additional final?irrigation using 2% chlorhexidine ( CHX ) and to compare the results with conventional two‐visit root canal treatment ( RCT ) with an intracanal calcium hydroxide ( CH ) dressing as a control group. Methodology Ninety asymptomatic maxillary anterior teeth with periapical lesions were treated by a single operator. Root canals were prepared using the step‐back technique with manual instrumentation with 2.5% Na OC l and 5% EDTA as irrigants. Half of the teeth were randomly assigned to the one‐visit ( OV ) group and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before canal filling. The other teeth were treated in two visits ( TV ) with a CH paste made by mixing CH powder and distilled water as an interappointment dressing. All patients were recalled and investigated clinically and radiographically for 24?months. Postoperative pain at 24–48?h and changes in apical bone?density indicating radiographic healing were evaluated statistically using the Mann–Whitney U ‐test followed by the Friedman and the Wilcoxon tests (α? =? 0.05). Results There were no significant differences between two groups regarding the incidence of postoperative pain at 24?h ( OV group 50% no pain, 47.6% mild, 2.4% moderate pain/ TV group 55% no pain, 42.5% mild, 2.5% moderate pain) and at 48?h ( OV group 95% no pain, 5% mild pain/ TV group 98% no pain, 2% mild pain). None of the patients reported severe postoperative pain, swelling and/or flare‐ups during the follow‐up period. There was no significant difference in the radiographic healing rates ( OV group 97.6% PAI 1 and/or PAI 2 and 2.4% PAI 3/ TV group 95% PAI 1 and/or PAI 2 and 5% PAI 3; P ??0.05). Conclusion Both groups provided favourable and similar postoperative pain and periapical healing rates at 24?months. Thus, one‐visit RCT with a final rinse with 2% CHX is an acceptable alternative to two‐visit RCT with CH as temporary dressing in maxillary anterior teeth.
机译:摘要旨在评估术后疼痛和牙线愈合术后牙齿炎症术后牙齿炎,额外的最后一次访问牙齿炎,并使用2%氯己定(CHX)灌溉,并与常规双访问根管治疗的结果进行比较(RCT)用甲羟化钙(CH)敷于对照组。通过单个操作员处理九十无症状的颌骨内颌骨前牙的方法。使用具有2.5%Na OC L和5%EDTA作为灌溉剂的手动仪器制备根系。一半的牙齿被随机分配到一次访问(OV)组,并在运河填充之前接受了2%CHX的额外最终冲洗。另外的牙齿在两次访问(TV)中,通过将CH粉末和蒸馏水混合作为相位性敷料来进行CH糊。所有患者均被召回并在临床上和射线照射到24个月。术后疼痛在24-48?h和顶端骨骼的变化?统计使用Mann-Whitney U -Test进行统计学评估射线照片愈合的密度,然后进行弗里德曼和威尔科克隆试验(α?= 0.05)。结果两组与24μs术后疼痛发生率之间没有显着差异(OV组50%不疼痛,47.6%温和,2.4%中等疼痛/电视组55%无疼痛,42.5%温和,2.5%温和疼痛)和48?H(ov组95%没有疼痛,5%温和疼痛/电视组98%无疼痛,2%温和疼痛)。患者均未在随访期间报告严重的术后疼痛,肿胀和/或爆发。射线照相愈合速率没有显着差异(OV组97.6%PAI 1和/或PAI 2和2.4%PAI 3 / TV组95%PAI 1和/或PAI 2和5%PAI 3; P?&gt ;? 0.05)。结论两组在24个月内提供良好和相似的术后疼痛和恐慌愈合率。因此,使用2%CHX的最终冲洗的一次性RCT是两次访问RCT的可接受的替代品,CH为颌骨前牙的临时敷料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号