...
首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Understanding organ donation in the collaborative era: a qualitative study of staff and family experiences.
【24h】

Understanding organ donation in the collaborative era: a qualitative study of staff and family experiences.

机译:了解协作时代的器官捐赠:对员工和家庭经验的定性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of the Breakthrough Collaborative Methodology (BCM) in increasing organ donation rates there has been little published evidence on the effect of the BCM on the wider attitudes and experiences of those involved in organ donation. This study sought to identify whether the National Organ Donation Collaborative in Australia had any additional influence on improving the experiences of staff and family members in the organ donation process. METHODS: IN-depth qualitative interviews with 17 family members from 13 families who had agreed to the organ donation of a deceased relative and 25 nurses and intensive care specialists at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria were carried out. RESULTS: The key factor in family members' decision to donate was prior knowledge of the deceased's donation wish. Although most family members did not regret their decision to donate, many were deeply dissatistified and, at times, confused by the technical and administrative nature of the donation process. Most staff members commented that the key community message about donation should be to encourage people to discuss donation rather than urging people to sign donor registers. CONCLUSION: This study identified valuable insights into the processes by which family members and intensive care unit staff deal with the actual processes of donation. Findings suggest that the process for families is far more complex than a simple agreement or refusal to donate. This study suggests that we should not assume that 'rates' of donation in Australia would increase merely through administrative programmes or marketing campaigns.
机译:背景:尽管突破性协作方法(BCM)的成功增加了因机构捐赠率,但对BCM对参与器官捐赠的更广泛态度和经验的影响几乎没有公布的证据。该研究试图确定澳大利亚的国家机构捐赠是否对改善机关捐赠过程中的工作人员和家庭成员的经验有任何额外的影响。方法:深入的定性访谈,来自17名家庭成员,从13个家庭达成一致的机构捐赠的有人捐赠了一名死者的亲戚和25名护理和重症监护专家,维多利亚州墨尔本墨尔本的阿尔弗雷德医院。结果:家庭成员决定捐赠的关键因素是对死者捐赠愿望的先验知识。虽然大多数家庭成员对捐赠的决定并没有后悔,但许多人在捐赠过程的技术和行政性质上深入消失。大多数工作人员评论说,关于捐赠的关键社区信息应该是鼓励人们讨论捐赠,而不是敦促人员签署捐赠者登记册。结论:本研究确定了家庭成员和重症监护股员工处理实际捐赠进程的过程的有价值的见解。调查结果表明,家庭的过程比简单的协议或拒绝捐赠更复杂。本研究表明,我们不应该假设澳大利亚捐赠的“汇率”仅通过行政方案或营销活动增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号