首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Medical Oncology Group of Australia position statement and membership survey on voluntary assisted dying
【24h】

Medical Oncology Group of Australia position statement and membership survey on voluntary assisted dying

机译:澳大利亚医学肿瘤群体宣言和志愿敏感

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract The controversial topic of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is receiving significant attention at state government levels and in the community. Acknowledging potential legalisation of VAD, the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) undertook a survey of members to inform the development of a position statement on the subject. All MOGA members were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. The survey comprised 12 closed‐response categorical questions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the survey data. Majority views expressed in the survey would form the basis of a MOGA position statement on VAD. A total of 362 members completed the questionnaire, representing 55% of the membership; 47% of respondents disagreed with VAD; 36% agreed with VAD and the remaining members (17%) were ‘neutral’. A clear majority position was not established. Only 14% agreed that physicians involved in VAD should be required personally to administer the lethal medication; 94% supported conscientious objection of physicians to the VAD process; 95% agreed that a palliative care physician consultation should be required and 86% agreed with the need for the involvement of specialist psychiatry medical services before a patient can be deemed as suitable for VAD. The MOGA membership expressed a range of views on the topic of VAD. A clear majority‐held view to support a MOGA position that either supports or opposes VAD was not established. The position statement that flows from the survey encourages informed debate on this topic and brings into focus important considerations.
机译:摘要自愿辅助死亡(VAD)的有争议议题在州政府水平和社区中受到重大关注。承认VAD的潜在合法化,澳大利亚的医学肿瘤学群(MOGA)对成员进行了调查,以便向该主题制定发表职位陈述。邀请所有MOGA成员完成匿名在线调查。该调查包括12个闭合响应分类问题。描述性统计数据用于总结调查数据。调查中表达的大多数观点将形成VAD上的MOGA职位陈述的基础。共有362名成员完成问卷,占成员的55%; 47%的受访者不同意VAD; 36%同意VAD,其余成员(17%)是“中立”。没有建立明确的多数职位。只有14%的人同意,应该亲自需要亲自参与VAD的医生来施用致命用药; 94%支持医生对VAD进程的良心反对; 95%的人同意,应要求姑息治疗医师咨询,86%同意在患者视为适合VAD之前达成专业精神病医疗服务的必要性。 MOGA成员资格对VAD主题表示一系列视图。一个明确的多数持有观点,支持不建立支持或反对VAD的MOGA位置。从调查中流动的立场声明鼓励有关此主题的知情辩论,并带来重点的重要考虑因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Internal medicine journal》 |2018年第7期|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Flinders Centre for Innovation in CancerFlinders UniversityAdelaide South Australia Australia;

    Department of Medical OncologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaide South Australia Australia;

    Flinders Centre for Innovation in CancerFlinders UniversityAdelaide South Australia Australia;

    Department of Medical OncologyRoyal Hobart HospitalHobart Tasmania Australia;

    Department of Medical OncologyPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourne Victoria Australia;

    Department of Medical OncologyEastern HealthMelbourne Victoria Australia;

    School of MedicineUniversity of Western AustraliaPerth Western Australia Australia;

    Department of Medical OncologyMonash UniversityMelbourne Victoria Australia;

    Concord Repatriation General HospitalSydney New South Wales Australia;

    University of South Australia Cancer Research InstituteAdelaide South Australia Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 内科学;
  • 关键词

    cancer; assisted dying; euthanasia; end of life; survey; position statement;

    机译:癌症;辅助死亡;安乐死;生命结束;调查;立场陈述;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号