首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Hospital discharge data under‐reports delirium occurrence: results from a point prevalence survey of delirium in a major Australian health service
【24h】

Hospital discharge data under‐reports delirium occurrence: results from a point prevalence survey of delirium in a major Australian health service

机译:医院放电数据报告谵妄发生:澳大利亚主要卫生服务谵妄点普遍调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Delirium in hospitalised patients is common, and a risk factor for adverse outcomes. Health services require accurate delirium data to monitor the impact of initiatives designed to improve detection and prevention of delirium. Aim To determine the extent to which International Classification of Disease codes represent delirium occurrence. Methods A cross‐sectional point prevalence survey was used to audit delirium occurrence in 25 inpatient wards of an Australian health service. All adult patients were eligible. Exclusion was for coma, end of life or behaviour that posed a risk to delirium assessors. Specially trained nurses and allied health professionals (AHP) screened patients for any cognitive impairment using the 4 A's Test (4AT). Those with abnormal screen test results were assessed using the ‘3‐Minute Diagnostic Interview for the Confusion Assessment Method’ (3D‐CAM). Delirium detected by 3D‐CAM was the reference standard. Results Of potentially eligible patients, 559 of 667 (83.8%) patients were assessed. The mean age was 73 years (±16.4), 54.5% were female and 43.8% (245/559) had cognitive impairment (4AT score ≥1). The occurrence of delirium during hospitalisation as identified by ICD codes was 10.4% (58/559; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.9–12.7) compared with a point prevalence of 16.2% (91/559; 95% CI, 13.2–19.1). Only 31 of 91 (34.1%) of those with delirium had ICD delirium codes assigned. Conclusion ICD coding is inadequate to determine in‐hospital delirium incidence. Instead, a point prevalence detection of delirium using the methods described above could be used. Health services could apply the described survey method to evaluate their local initiatives for the improvement of delirium detection and prevention.
机译:摘要背景谵妄在住院患者患者是常见的,以及不良结果的危险因素。卫生服务需要准确的谵妄数据来监测旨在改善谵妄检测和预防的举措的影响。旨在确定国际疾病代码分类的程度代表谵妄发生。方法采用横截面积普及调查,审计澳大利亚卫生服务25家住院病房中的谵妄发生。所有成年患者都有资格。排除是昏迷,为谵妄评估员带来风险的生命结束或行为。特殊培训的护士和盟军卫生专业人士(AHP)筛选患者,用于使用4 A测试(4AT)的任何认知障碍。使用异常筛选结果的人使用“混乱评估方法”(3D-Cam)的“3分钟诊断面试”评估。 3D-Cam检测的谵妄是参考标准。评估潜在符合条件患者的结果,559例(83.8%)患者。平均年龄为73岁(±16.4),54.5%是女性,43.8%(245/559)具有认知障碍(4AT得分≥1)。由ICD代码鉴定的住院期间谵妄的发生为10.4%(58/559; 95%置信区间(CI),7.9-12.7),而患病率为16.2%(91/559; 95%CI,13.2- 19.1)。只有91个(34.1%)的谵妄仅有31个(34.1%)的人有ICD谵妄代码。结论ICD编码不充分,以确定医院谵妄发病率。相反,可以使用使用上述方法的谵妄的点流行率检测。卫生服务可以应用所描述的调查方法来评估他们的当地举措,以改善谵妄检测和预防。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号