...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study.
【24h】

A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study.

机译:一种预期随机的多中心对照试验,对成人密集护理单位密集胰岛素治疗紧身葡萄糖控制:葡聚糖研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: An optimal target for glucose control in ICU patients remains unclear. This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the effects on ICU mortality of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) with an intermediate glucose control. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to the 21 participating medico-surgical ICUs were randomized to group 1 (target BG 7.8-10.0 mmol/L) or to group 2 (target BG 4.4-6.1 mmol/L). RESULTS: While the required sample size was 1,750 per group, the trial was stopped early due to a high rate of unintended protocol violations. From 1,101 admissions, the outcomes of 542 patients assigned to group 1 and 536 of group 2 were analysed. The groups were well balanced. BG levels averaged in group 1 8.0 mmol/L (IQR 7.1-9.0) (median of all values) and 7.7 mmol/L (IQR 6.7-8.8) (median of morning BG) versus 6.5 mmol/L (IQR 6.0-7.2) and 6.1 mmol/L (IQR 5.5-6.8) for group 2 (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The percentage of patients treated with insulin averaged 66.2 and 96.3%, respectively. Proportion of time spent in target BG was similar, averaging 39.5% and 45.1% (median (IQR) 34.3 (18.5-50.0) and 39.3 (26.2-53.6)%) in the groups 1 and 2, respectively. The rate of hypoglycaemia was higher in the group 2 (8.7%) than in group 1 (2.7%, p < 0.0001). ICU mortality was similar in the two groups (15.3 vs. 17.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this prematurely stopped and therefore underpowered study, there was a lack of clinical benefit of intensive insulin therapy (target 4.4-6.1 mmol/L), associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycaemia, as compared to a 7.8-10.0 mmol/L target. (ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT00107601, EUDRA-CT Number: 200400391440).
机译:目的:ICU患者葡萄糖对照的最佳目标仍不清楚。该前瞻性随机对照试验比较了对强烈胰岛素治疗(IIT)的ICU死亡率的影响,具有中间葡萄糖对照。方法:进入21种参与药物手术ICU的成年患者随机分为1(靶BG 7.8-10.0mmol / L)或第2组(靶BG 4.4-6.1mmol / L)。结果:虽然所需的样品尺寸为每组1,750次,但由于违反意外议定书的高速率,试验早期停止。从1,101次入院,分析了分配给第2组和第2组第1组和536款的患者的结果。这些群体平衡了。 BG水平在第1组8.0 mmol / L(IQR 7.1-9.0)(所有值的中位数)和7.7 mmol / L(IQR 6.7-8.8)(早晨BG的中位数)与6.5 mmol / L(IQR 6.0-7.2)和6.1毫米/ L(IQR 5.5-6.8)用于第2组(对于两个比较的P <0.0001)。用胰岛素治疗的患者的百分比分别平均为66.2和96.3%。靶BG中花费的比例相似,平均39.5%和45.1%(中位数(IQR)34.3(18.5-50.0)和39.3(26.2-53.6)%)分别在组1和2中。第2组(8.7%)中低血糖率高于1(2.7%,P <0.0001)。 ICU死亡率在两组中相似(15.3与17.2%)。结论:在这种过早停止并因此减轻的研究中,与7.8-10.0 mmol / L相比,缺乏患有胰岛素治疗(目标4.4-6.1mmol / L)的临床缺乏患者,与低血糖血症发病率增加相关目标。 (ClinicalTrials.gov#NCT00107601,EUDRA-CT编号:200400391440)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号