首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Limitations of 64-detector-row computed tomography coronary angiography: calcium and motion but not short experience.
【24h】

Limitations of 64-detector-row computed tomography coronary angiography: calcium and motion but not short experience.

机译:64排螺旋CT冠状动脉造影的局限性:钙和运动,但经验不足。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recently, 64-detector-row computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) has been introduced for the noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity and limitations of a newly established CTA service. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 101 outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease, 64-detector-row CTA (VCT Lightspeed 64; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisc., USA) was performed before invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The presence of >50% diameter coronary stenosis on CTA was rated by two radiologists recently trained in CTA, and separately by an experienced colleague. Diagnostic performance of CTA was calculated on segment, vessel, and patient levels, using ICA as a reference. Segments with a proximal reference diameter <2 mm or with stents were not analyzed. RESULTS: In 51 of 101 patients and 121 of 1280 segments, ICA detected coronary stenosis. In 274 of 1280 (21%) segments, CTA had non-diagnostic image quality, the main reasons being severe calcifications (49%), motion artifacts associated with high or irregular heart rate (45%), and low contrast opacification (14%). Significantly more women (43%) had non-diagnostic scans compared to men (20%). A heart rate above 60 beats per minute was associated with significantly more non-diagnostic patients (38% vs. 18%). In the 1006 diagnostic segments, CTA had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 54%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98% for detecting significant coronary stenosis. In 29 patients, CTA was non-diagnostic. In the remaining 72 patients, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 65%, PPV 79%, and NPV 100%. The use of a more experienced CTA reader did not improve diagnostic performance. CONCLUSION: CTA had a very high negative predictive value, but the number of non-diagnostic scans was high, especially in women. The main limitations were motion artifacts and vessel calcifications, while short experience in CTA did not influence the interpretation.
机译:背景技术:最近,64排计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTA)已被引入用于冠状动脉疾病的非侵入性诊断。目的:评估新建立的CTA服务的诊断能力和局限性。材料与方法:在101例疑似冠状动脉疾病的门诊患者中,在侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)之前进行了64排行CTA(VCT Lightspeed 64; GE Healthcare,美国密西根州密尔沃基)。最近接受过CTA培训的两名放射线医师和一位经验丰富的同事分别对CTA上直径大于50%的冠状动脉狭窄进行了评估。使用ICA作为参考,计算了CTA的诊断性能,分为段,血管和患者水平。未分析近端参考直径<2 mm或具有支架的节段。结果:在101例患者中的51例和1280例中的121例中,ICA检测到了冠状动脉狭窄。在1280个片段中的274个片段(占21%)中,CTA的图像质量无法诊断,主要原因是严重的钙化(49%),与高或不规则心率相关的运动伪影(45%)和低对比度浑浊(14%) )。与男性(20%)相比,女性(43%)进行非诊断性扫描的比例明显更高。每分钟60次以上的心率与更多非诊断患者相关(38%对18%)。在1006个诊断段中,CTA对检测到严重的冠状动脉狭窄的敏感性为78%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值(PPV)为54%,阴性预测值(NPV)为98%。在29例患者中,CTA无法诊断。在其余的72名患者中,敏感性为100%,特异性为65%,PPV为79%,NPV为100%。使用经验更丰富的CTA阅读器不会提高诊断性能。结论:CTA具有很高的阴性预测价值,但非诊断性扫描的次数很高,尤其是女性。主要局限性是运动伪影和血管钙化,而在CTA中的短暂经验不会影响解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号