...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Corporate Change >What drives labor market polarization in advanced countries? The role of China and technology
【24h】

What drives labor market polarization in advanced countries? The role of China and technology

机译:什么推动高级国家的劳动力市场极化? 中国与技术的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article explores the effects of offshoring, technology, and Chinese import competition on labor market polarization in European countries. We find that polarization occurs mostly as a result of polarization within individual industries, while the reallocation of employment away from less polarized industries toward more highly polarized industries contributed only about one-third of the total change. We find that both technological change and Chinese net import competition contributed to labor market polarization, but that they did so in distinct ways. In European manufacturing industries, ICT adoption explains a third of within-industry polarization, while Chinese net import competition contributed to a much smaller extent. The process of between-industry polarization is driven by widespread deindustrialization and servitization in developed countries. We find that Chinese net import competition explains about a fifth of the employment decline in lowly polarized manufacturing industries and was thus an important driver of the reallocation of labor within economies away from lowly polarized manufacturing industries. We present tentative evidence that employment grew faster in initially highly polarized service industries. Moreover, these industries appear unaffected by their indirect input-output-exposure to Chinese net import competition, while this was not the case for initially lowly polarized service industries. While polarization patterns in different European labor markets show considerable heterogeneity, labor market institutions seem to be insufficient to explain these cross-country differences.
机译:本文探讨了离岸外包,技术和中国进口竞争对欧洲国家劳动力市场极化的影响。我们发现,由于个人行业的极化,极化发生了极化,而从较偏振的行业朝向更高度极高的偏振行业的重新分配只有大约三分之一的变化。我们发现技术变革和中国净进口竞争都有助于劳动力市场的极化,但他们以独特的方式做得如此。在欧洲制造业,ICT采用解释了行业内部两分之一的三分之一,而中国净进口竞争导致更小的程度。在发达国家的广泛的去工业化和伺服化是行业极化的过程。我们发现,中国净进口竞争阐述了差别极化制造业的就业下降的五分之一,因此是远离差别极化制造业的经济体内劳动力重新分配的重要推动力。我们展示了初步证据,即最初高度偏振的服务行业的就业更快。此外,这些行业似乎不受他们对中国净进口竞争的间接投入输出暴露的影响,而最初差别极化服务行业并非如此。虽然不同欧洲劳动力市场中的极化模式表现出相当大的异质性,但劳动力市场机构似乎不足以解释这些跨国差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号