...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: A systematic review
【24h】

Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: A systematic review

机译:决策有助于改善妊娠护理的知情决策:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Rapid development in health care has resulted in an increasing number of screening and treatment options. Consequently, there is an urgency to provide people with relevant information about benefits and risks of healthcare options in an unbiased way. Decision aids help people to make decisions by providing unbiased non-directive research evidence about all treatment options. Objective To determine the effectiveness of decision aids to improve informed decision making in pregnancy care. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE (1953-2011), EMBASE (1980-2011), CENTRAL (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library; 2011, Issue 4), Psycinfo (1806-2011) and Research Registers of ongoing trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.controlled-trials.com). Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials comparing decision aids in addition to standard care. The study population needed to be pregnant women making actual decisions concerning their pregnancy. Data collection and analysis Two independent researchers extracted data on quality of the randomised controlled trial (GRADE criteria), quality of the decision aid (IPDAS criteria), and outcome measures. Data analysis was undertaken by assessing group differences at first follow up after the interventions. Main results Ten randomised controlled trials could be included. Pooled analyses showed that decision aids significantly increased knowledge, (weighted mean difference 11.06, 95% confidence interval 4.85-17.27), decreased decisional conflict scores (weighted mean difference -3.66, 95% confidence interval -6.65 to -0.68) and decreased anxiety (weighted mean difference -1.56, 95% confidence interval -2.75 to -0.43). Conclusions Our systematic review showed the positive effect of decision aids on informed decision making in pregnancy care. Future studies should focus on increasing the uptake of decision aids in clinical practice by identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation.
机译:背景技术卫生保健的迅速发展导致越来越多的筛查和治疗选择。因此,迫切需要以公正的方式向人们提供有关医疗保健选择的收益和风险的相关信息。决策辅助工具通过提供有关所有治疗选择的公正无偏的研究证据来帮助人们做出决策。目的确定决策辅助工具在妊娠护理中改善知情决策的有效性。搜索策略我们搜索了MEDLINE(1953-2011),EMBASE(1980-2011),CENTRAL(CENTRAL,Cochrane图书馆; 2011年第4期),Psycinfo(1806-2011)和正在进行的试验研究注册(www.clinicaltrials.gov) ,www.control-trials.com)。选择标准除了标准护理外,我们还包括比较决策辅助工具的随机对照试验。研究人群必须是孕妇,要就自己的怀孕做出实际决定。数据收集和分析两名独立研究人员提取了有关随机对照试验质量(GRADE标准),决策辅助质量(IPDAS标准)和结果指标的数据。通过在干预后的首次随访中评估组间差异来进行数据分析。主要结果可以包括十项随机对照试验。汇总分析显示,决策辅助显着增加了知识(加权平均差异11.06,95%置信区间4.85-17.27),降低了决策冲突评分(加权平均差异-3.66,95%置信区间-6.65至-0.68)和焦虑降低了(加权平均差-1.56,95%置信区间-2.75至-0.43)。结论我们的系统评价显示了决策辅助对妊娠保健知情决策的积极作用。未来的研究应通过确定实施障碍和促进因素,着重于增加临床实践中对决策辅助手段的采用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号