...
首页> 外文期刊>Automatica >Non-indexability of the stochastic appointment scheduling problem
【24h】

Non-indexability of the stochastic appointment scheduling problem

机译:随机预约调度问题的不可转位性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Consider a set of jobs with independent random service times to be scheduled on a single machine. The jobs can be surgeries in an operating room, patients' appointments in outpatient clinics, etc. The challenge is to determine the optimal sequence and appointment times of jobs to minimize some function of the server idle time and service start-time delay. We introduce a generalized objective function of delay and idle time, and consider l(1)-type and l(2)-type cost functions as special cases of interest. Determining an index-based policy for the optimal sequence in which to schedule jobs has been an open problem for many years. For example, it was conjectured that 'least variance first' (LVF) policy is optimal for the l(1)-type objective. This is known to be true for the case of two jobs with specific distributions. A key result in this paper is that the optimal sequencing problem is non-indexable, i.e., neither the variance, nor any other such index can be used to determine the optimal sequence in which to schedule jobs for l(1) and l(2)-type objectives. We then show that given a sequence in which to schedule the jobs, sample average approximation yields a solution which is statistically consistent. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:考虑一组具有独立随机服务时间的作业,以便在单个计算机上安排。这些工作可以在手术室的手术室,患者在门诊诊所的任命等。挑战是确定工作的最佳顺序和约会时间,以最大限度地减少服务器空闲时间和服务开始时延迟的某些功能。我们介绍了延迟和空闲时间的广义目标函数,并考虑L(1)型和L(2)型成本函数作为特殊感兴趣的案例。确定要安排作业的最佳序列的基于索引的策略多年来是一个公开问题。例如,猜测它是L(1)型目的最佳最佳的“最小方案首先”(LVF)策略。众所周知,对于具有特定分布的两个作业的情况,这是真的。本文的一个关键结果是最佳测序问题是不可转换的,即缺差,也不可以使用任何其他此类索引来确定用于调度L(1)和L的作业的最佳序列(2 ) - 型目标。然后,我们示出了给定调度作业的顺序,样本平均近似产生统计上一致的解决方案。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号