...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Evaluating the performance of five different chemical ionization techniques for detecting gaseous oxygenated organic species
【24h】

Evaluating the performance of five different chemical ionization techniques for detecting gaseous oxygenated organic species

机译:评价五种不同化学电离技术的检测检测气态含氧有机物质的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The impact of aerosols on climate and air quality remains poorly understood due to multiple factors. One of the current limitations is the incomplete understanding of the contribution of oxygenated products, generated from the gas-phase oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), to aerosol formation. Indeed, atmospheric gaseous chemical processes yield thousands of (highly) oxygenated species, spanning a wide range of chemical formulas, functional groups and, consequently, volatilities. While recent mass spectrometric developments have allowed extensive on-line detection of a myriad of oxygenated organic species, playing a central role in atmospheric chemistry, the detailed quantification and characterization of this diverse group of compounds remains extremely challenging. To address this challenge, we evaluated the capability of current state-of-the-art mass spectrometers equipped with different chemical ionization sources to detect the oxidation products formed from alpha-Pinene ozonolysis under various conditions. Five different mass spectrometers were deployed simultaneously for a chamber study. Two chemical ionization atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometers (CI-APi-TOF) with nitrate and amine reagent ion chemistries and an iodide chemical ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOF-CIMS) were used. Additionally, a proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF 8000) and a new "vocus" PTR-TOF were also deployed. In the current study, we compared around 1000 different compounds between each of the five instruments, with the aim of determining which oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) the different methods were sensitive to and identifying regions where two or more instruments were able to detect species with similar molecular formulae. We utilized a large variability in conditions (including different VOCs, ozone, NOx and OH scavenger concentrations) in our newly constructed atmospheric simulation chamber for a comprehensive correlation analysis between all instruments. This analysis, combined with estimated concentrations for identified molecules in each instrument, yielded both expected and surprising results. As anticipated based on earlier studies, the PTR instruments were the only ones able to measure the precursor VOC, the iodide TOF-CIMS efficiently detected many semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) with three to five oxygen atoms, and the nitrate CI-APi-TOF was mainly sensitive to highly oxygenated organic (O > 5) molecules (HOMs). In addition, the vocus showed good agreement with the iodide TOF-CIMS for the SVOC, including a range of organonitrates. The amine CI-APi-TOF agreed well with the nitrate CI-APi-TOF for HOM dimers. However, the loadings in our experiments caused the amine reagent ion to be considerably depleted, causing nonlinear responses for monomers. This study explores and highlights both benefits and limitations of currently available chemical ionization mass spectrometry instrumentation for characterizing the wide variety of OVOCs in the atmosphere. While specifically shown for the case of alpha-Pinene ozonolysis, we expect our general findings to also be valid for a wide range of other VOC-oxidant systems. As discussed in this study, no single instrument configuration can be deemed better or worse than the others, as the optimal instrument for a particular study ultimately depends on the specific target of the study.
机译:由于多种因素,气候醇对气候和空气质量的影响仍然很差。目前的限制是对氧化产物的贡献的不完全理解,从挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的气相氧化产生气溶胶形成。实际上,大气气态化学过程产生数千(高度)的含氧物种,跨越各种化学式,官能团,因此挥发性。虽然最近的质谱发育允许广泛地在线检测无数的含氧有机物物种,在大气化学中发挥着核心作用,但这种不同组化合物的详细定量和表征仍然非常具有挑战性。为了解决这一挑战,我们评估了配备有不同化学电离源的当前最先进的质谱仪的能力,以检测在各种条件下由α-叉烯臭氧溶解形成的氧化产物。同时部署五种不同的质谱仪进行腔室研究。使用具有硝酸盐和胺试剂离子化学品(CI-API-TOF)的两种化学电离大气压接口飞行时间质谱仪和碘化物化学电离飞行时间质谱仪(TOF-CIMS)。另外,还部署了质子转移反应飞行时间质谱仪(PTR-TOF 8000)和新的“VOCUS”PTR-TOF。在目前的研究中,我们在五种仪器中的每一个之间比较了1000种不同的化合物,目的是确定哪些氧化的VOC(OVOCS)对不同方法对其敏感的氧化VOC(OVOCS)敏感,其中两个或多个仪器能够检测具有相似的物种的物种分子配方。在我们的新构建的大气模拟室中,我们在新构造的大气模拟室中使用了大的变化(包括不同的VOC,臭氧,NOx和OH清除剂浓度,以在所有仪器之间进行全面的相关性分析。该分析与每种仪器中鉴定的分子的估计浓度相结合,产生了预期和令人惊讶的结果。由于预期基于早期的研究,PTR仪器是唯一能够测量前体VOC的人,碘化物TOF-CIMS有效地检测到许多半挥发性有机化合物(SVOCS),其中三到五个氧原子和硝酸盐CI-API -TOF主要敏感于高氧化有机(O> 5)分子(HOMS)。此外,该脊髓患有与SVOC的碘化物TOF-CIMS良好,包括一系列有机腈。胺CI-API-TOF与HOM二聚体的硝酸盐CI-API-TOF很好。然而,我们实验中的载荷使胺试剂离子相当耗尽,导致单体的非线性反应。本研究探讨了当前可用的化学电离质谱仪器的益处和局限性,用于表征大气中各种卵子。虽然专门显示为α-叉烯臭氧溶解的情况,但我们预计我们的一般发现也适用于各种其他VOC氧化系统。如本研究所述,由于特定研究的最佳仪器最终取决于该研究的特定仪器,因此不能认为没有单一仪器配置更好或更差。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric Measurement Techniques》 |2019年第4期|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Aerodyne Res Inc Billerica MA USA;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

    Univ Helsinki Fac Sci Inst Atmospher &

    Earth Syst Res Phys Helsinki 00140 Finland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 计量学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号