...
首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Organs >Evaluation with micro‐CT of different anticoagulation strategies during hemodialysis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A randomized crossover study
【24h】

Evaluation with micro‐CT of different anticoagulation strategies during hemodialysis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A randomized crossover study

机译:血小板减少症患者血液透析期间不同抗凝策略的微型CT评价:随机交叉研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract In patients with enhanced risk for bleeding, heparin‐free hemodialysis (HD) with conventional dialyzers is routinely used. To explore the potential benefit of using heparin‐coated dialyzers, we used a reference CT‐scanning technique and registered different clotting parameters to quantify coagulation with heparin‐coated versus non‐coated dialyzers. Six HD patients with thrombocytopenia were dialyzed 240?min in a randomized crossover study with Evodial 1.3 or FX600 Cordiax, each without anticoagulation. Blood samples were taken from the vascular access predialysis, and from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 5 and 240?min after dialysis start. Predialysis blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocytes, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. On dialyzer inlet and outlet blood samples, a viscoelastic measurement of blood coagulation was performed using a Sonoclot analyzer. After dialysis, dialyzers were visually scored, subsequently dried for 24?h, weighed, and scanned with micro‐CT at a resolution of 25?μm. After image reconstruction, the open, non‐coagulated fibers were counted in a representative cross‐section at the dialyzer outlet. No sessions were terminated prematurely for circuit clotting. Heparin‐coated dialyzers had more patent fibers on micro‐CT versus non‐coated dialyzers and also had a better score of subjective visual assessment of fiber clotting. There was no difference in subjective assessment of clotting at the venous drip chamber. With both dialyzers, all ACT values remained in the normal range, and were lower at the dialyzer outlet versus inlet. In conclusion, dialysis with a heparin‐coated versus non heparin‐coated membrane results in substantially less coagulated fibers during 4?h hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation. Eventual leaching of heparin, immobilized on the fiber membrane, does not result in measurable systemic anticoagulation.
机译:摘要在增强出血风险的患者中,常规使用常规透析器的免疫血液透析(HD)。为了探讨使用肝素涂覆的透析器的潜在益处,我们使用了参考CT扫描技术和注册的不同凝血参数,以量化肝素涂层与未涂覆的透析器的凝固。在随机交叉研究中透析血小板减少症的六个高清患者,在随机1.3或FX600 Cordiax中没有抗凝血。从血管进入预析出血管进入血液中取出血液样品,并从透析开始后从透析仪入口和出口。分析预先分析血红蛋白,血细胞比容,血小板,纤维蛋白原和活化的部分血栓形成蛋白时间。在透析仪入口和出口血液样品上,使用Sonoclot分析仪进行血凝凝血的粘弹性测量。在透析后,视觉探测透析器,随后干燥24μl,称重,并以25μm的分辨率用微型CT扫描。在图像重建之后,在透析器出口的代表性横截面中计数打开的非凝结纤维。没有过早地终止会议进行电路凝结。肝素涂覆的透析器在微型CT与非涂覆透析器上有更多的专利纤维,并且还具有更好的纤维凝固性视觉评估。静脉滴灌室凝固的主观评估没有差异。通过透析器,所有动作值仍处于正常范围,并且在透析器出口与入口处较低。总之,涂覆肝素涂覆的透析与非肝素涂覆的膜,导致在4μl血液透析期间的基本上更小的凝结纤维,而不会系统性抗凝。最终浸出肝素,固定在纤维膜上,不会导致可测量的系统性抗凝。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号