首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Organs >In Vitro Hemocompatibility Evaluation of Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Flow Conditions: A Benchmark Study
【24h】

In Vitro Hemocompatibility Evaluation of Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Flow Conditions: A Benchmark Study

机译:在儿科流动条件下心室辅助装置的体外血液相解评价:基准研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Development of pediatric ventricular assist devices (VADs) has significantly lagged behind that of adult devices. This frustrating reality is reflected by the fact that the Berlin Heart EXCOR VAD is currently the only approved pediatric‐specific device in the USA. An alternative option is an off‐label use of adult continuous‐flow VADs, such as HeartMate II (HMII), which inevitably causes patient‐device size mismatch in small children. We sought to conduct in vitro hemocompatibility testing in a pediatric flow condition, with a specific aim to provide benchmark values for future pediatric device development. Given the aforementioned fact that both pulsatile and continuous‐flow devices are being used in the pediatric population, we opted to test both types of devices in the present study. The EXCOR and HMII blood pumps were tested using bovine blood under constant hemodynamic conditions (flow rate, Q ?=?2.5?±?0.25L/min; differential pressure across the pump, Δ P ?=?68?±?5mm Hg). Hemolysis was measured by Harboe assay. There was a steady increase in plasma free hemoglobin during in vitro testing, with a statistically significant difference between 5 and 360 min for both EXCOR ( P ??0.0001) and HMII ( P ??0.001). However, the degree of an increase in plasma free hemoglobin was more significant with HMII ( P ??0.001). Normalized index of hemolysis for EXCOR and HMII were 0.003?±?0.0026g/100 L and 0.085?±?0.0119g/100 L, respectively. There was also a steady increase in platelet activation detected by CAPP2A antibody using flow cytometry, with a statistically significant difference between 5 and 360 min for both devices ( P ??0.05). The degree of an increase in platelet activation was similar between the two devices ( P ?=?0.218). High molecular weight von Willebrand factor (HMW vWF) multimer degradation measured by immunoblotting was evident for both devices, however, it was more pronounced with the EXCOR. EXCOR blood samples from all three time points (120, 240, and 360 min) were significantly different from the baseline (5 min), whereas only 360 min samples had a significant difference from the baseline with the HMII. In conclusion, we have observed similarities and differences in hemocompatibility profiles between the EXCOR and HMII, both of which are commonly used in the pediatric population. We anticipate the benchmark values in the present study will facilitate future pediatric VAD development.
机译:摘要小儿心室辅助装置(VADS)的发展显着落后于成人设备的背后。这一令人沮丧的现实反映在于柏林心脏Vad目前是美国唯一批准的儿科特定设备。另一种选择是成人连续流动VAD的偏离标签,例如心脏II(HMII),这不可避免地导致小孩子的患者装置尺寸不匹配。我们试图在儿科流量条件下进行体外血液相位性测试,具体旨在为未来的儿科设备开发提供基准值。鉴于上述事实:在儿科人群中使用脉动和连续流动装置,我们选择在本研究中测试两种类型的装置。在恒定血液动力学条件下使用牛血(流量,Q?=?2.5?±0.25L / min;泵送泵,ΔP≤x≤68Ω 。通过HARBOE测定法测量溶血。在体外测试过程中,血浆自由血红蛋白的稳定增加,两种reSOR(p≤0.0001)和HMII(p≤≤0.001)之间的统计学上显着差异为5至360分钟。然而,血浆可自由血红蛋白的增加程度与HMII(p≤≤0.001)更显着。 recor和HMII的常规溶血指数分别为0.003Ω·α±0.0026g / 100L和0.085?±0.0119g / 100升。 CAPP2A抗体使用流式细胞术检测的血小板激活稳定增加,两种装置(P = 0.05)的统计学上显着差异为5至360分钟。两种器件之间的血小板激活的增加程度(p?= 0.218)之间相似。通过免疫印迹测量的高分子量von Willebrand因子(HMW VWF)多聚体降解对于两种器件而言,这两种装置都很明显,但是,它与excor更明显。来自所有三个时间点(120,240和360分钟)的rescor血液样本与基线(5分钟)显着不同,而只有360分钟的样本与HMII的基线有显着差异。总之,我们观察到excor和HMII之间的血液相然谱的相似性和差异,两者在儿科人群中常用。我们预计本研究中的基准标记值将促进未来的儿科VAD开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号