...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Open Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Transosseous Suture Fixation of the Meniscal Body Significantly Decreases Meniscal Extrusion Rate Compared With Arthroscopic Technique
【24h】

Open Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Transosseous Suture Fixation of the Meniscal Body Significantly Decreases Meniscal Extrusion Rate Compared With Arthroscopic Technique

机译:与关节镜技术相比,半月岩缝合固定的开放半月板同种异体移植型混凝器固定显着降低了半月板挤出率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To assess and compare meniscal extrusion rates after lateral "bridge-in-slot" meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) with arthroscopic versus open insertion. Methods: In this review of prospectively collected data, we analyzed data from patients who underwent arthroscopic or open lateral MAT. Patients who underwent concomitant distal femoral osteotomy, for whom 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was unavailable, or who underwent open lateral MAT without the use of transosseous sutures were excluded. Meniscal extrusion in the included patients was assessed by 2 independent examiners by measuring the absolute value and the relative percentage of extrusion on 1.5-T magnetic resonance images at 1-year follow-up. The number of MATs with radial displacement larger or smaller than 3 mm was determined. Results: A total of 20 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 10 underwent arthroscopic and 10 underwent open lateral MAT. No statistically significant differences were found in baseline demographic data. Absolute meniscal extrusion was similar between the groups (P = .091). A significantly larger relative percentage of extrusion (arthroscopic MAT, 31 +/- 27 mm; open MAT, 10 +/- 29 mm; 95% confidence interval, -0.4 to -0.02 mm; P = .03) and a significantly higher extrusion rate were found in patients treated with arthroscopic MAT than in those treated with open MAT (>3 mm in 5 patients 150%1 with arthroscopic MAT and 0 patients with open MAT, P = .01). Conclusions: This study identified similar absolute extrusion and significantly lower postoperative lateral meniscal extrusion rates after open MAT compared with arthroscopic MAT. Transosseous fixation of the meniscal body appears protective against meniscal extrusion after MAT.
机译:目的:用关节镜与开放式插入进行横向“桥”半月板同种异体移植移植(MAT)后评估和比较半月板挤压率。方法:在本次综述中,我们分析了接受关节镜或开放垫垫的患者的数据。患者接受了伴随的远端股骨骨质术,未使用1年的术后磁共振成像,或者在不使用经骨缝合线的情况下进行开放的侧面垫。通过在1年随访时测量挤出的绝对值和挤出的绝对值和相对百分比,由2名患者进行半月板挤压。确定具有径向位移或更大或小于3mm的垫子的数量。结果:共有20名患者达到含有标准,其中10名接受关节镜和10个接受开放的侧面垫。在基线人口统计数据中没有发现统计学上的显着差异。绝对半月板挤出在组之间相似(p = .091)。挤出的相对百分比显着更大(关节镜垫,31 +/- 27 mm;开垫,10 +/- 29 mm; 95%置信区间,-0.4至-0.02 mm; p = .03)和显着更高的挤出在用关节镜垫处处理的患者中发现的速率比在用露天垫处处理的那些(5例患者150%1,用关节镜垫和0患者开放式垫,P = .01患者)。结论:本研究确定了与关节镜垫相比,开放式垫子后的绝对挤出和显着降低术后侧半月板挤出率。垫子后,半月板的固定固定效果对半月板挤出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号