首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system.
【24h】

Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system.

机译:使用导航系统对对侧韧带重建膝关节膝关节膝关节膝关节膝关节膝关节膝关节膝关节膝关节的术中比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees and contralateral stable knees by use of intraoperative navigation. METHODS: Five patients with ipsilateral ACL-deficient knees with contralateral stable knees without any ligament injuries were included in this study. Anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity during anterior drawer force applied manually and range of tibial rotation and AP knee laxity during internal and external rotational torque applied manually in both the ACL-deficient knee and the contralateral stable knee were measured by use of a navigation system from 15 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion. After the temporary fixation of the posterolateral bundle, anteromedial bundle (AMB), or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction, knee laxity was measured again and compared with that of the stable knee. RESULTS: The mean laxities for PLB reconstruction were significantly greater than those of the contralateral stable knee at more than 75 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05). The mean laxities for AMB or DB reconstruction were not significantly different from those of the contralateral stable knee at all knee flexion angles. Those for AMB reconstruction were within +1.6 mm and those for DB reconstruction were within -2.0 mm of those of the contralateral stable knee. The mean rotations for all reconstructions were significantly less than those of the contralateral stable knee at less than 30 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: DB and AMB reconstructions could restore knee laxity closer to the level of the contralateral stable knee. Because normal knee laxity is different in each individual, evaluation of contralateral stable knee laxity during ACL reconstruction surgery would be helpful for restoration to the level of the specific preinjury knee laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是通过使用术中导航将前令韧带(ACL) - 折叠膝关节(ACL)的膝盖和对侧稳定膝关节进行比较。方法:本研究中纳入了没有任何韧带损伤的对侧稳定膝盖的5例同侧ACL缺乏膝盖的患者。通过使用导航系统测量手动施加的前抽屉手动和胫骨旋转范围和胫骨旋转范围和胫骨旋转范围和AP膝关节旋转范围和AP膝关节旋转的范围和AP膝盖松弛的膝关节膝关节15度至90度的膝关节屈曲。在后外侧束的临时固定后,前膝束(AMB)或双束(DB)重建,再次测量膝关节松弛,并与稳定的膝关节的膝关节进行比较。结果:PLB重建的平均松弛显着大于超过75°膝关节屈曲的对侧稳定膝关节(P <.05)。 AMB或DB重建的平均松弛与所有膝关节角度的对侧稳定膝关节的平均松弛无显着。用于AMB重建的人在+1.6毫米之内,DB重建的人在对侧稳定膝关节的距离-2.0mm。所有重建的平均旋转显着小于膝关节屈曲的对侧稳定膝关节(P <.05)。结论:DB和AMB重建可以将膝盖松弛恢复更接近对侧稳定膝关节的水平。由于每个人的夜膝部松弛是不同的,因为在ACL重建手术期间对对侧稳定的膝关节肿块的评估将有助于恢复到特定的前膝盖松弛程度的水平。证据水平:IV级,治疗案例系列。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号