...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis and Rheumatism >Treatment of polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis without poor-prognosis factors: A prospective randomized study of one hundred twenty-four patients.
【24h】

Treatment of polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis without poor-prognosis factors: A prospective randomized study of one hundred twenty-four patients.

机译:无差预测因素的聚调节炎和微观多阳炎的治疗:一百二十四名患者的前瞻性随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids alone as first-line treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) without poor-prognosis factors as defined by the Five-Factors Score (FFS), and to compare the efficacy and safety of azathioprine versus pulse cyclophosphamide as adjunctive immunosuppressive therapy for patients experiencing treatment failure or relapse. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, therapeutic trial included 124 patients with newly diagnosed PAN or MPA (FFS of 0) treated with corticosteroids alone. At the time of treatment failure or disease relapse, patients were randomized to receive 6 months of therapy with oral azathioprine or 6 pulses of cyclophosphamide. Analyses was performed according to an intent-to-treat strategy. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD followup period was 62 +/- 33 months. Treatment with corticosteroids alone induced remission in 98 patients; 50 (40%) of these patients had sustained disease remission, 46 (37%) experienced a relapse, and 2 became corticosteroid dependent (daily prednisone dose > or = 20 mg). In 26 patients (21%), treatment with corticosteroids alone failed, and 49 patients (40%) required additional immunosuppression. Among the 39 patients randomized, 13 of 19 achieved remission with cyclophosphamide pulses, and 14 of 20 achieved remission with azathioprine. Among all patients, the 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 99% and 92%, respectively. Six deaths occurred in the cyclophosphamide-treated group compared with 2 deaths in the azathioprine-treated group. Disease-free survival was significantly lower for patients with MPA than for those with PAN (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: For patients with PAN or MPA with an FFS of 0, overall 5-year survival was good, but first-line corticosteroid treatment was able to achieve and maintain remission in only about half of the patients, and 40% of the patients required additional immunosuppressive therapy. Azathioprine or pulse cyclophosphamide was fairly effective for treating corticosteroid-resistant disease or major relapses.
机译:目的:评估全身性皮质类固醇单独作为多性炎症(PAN)和微观多阳炎(MPA)的一线治疗,没有差的预后因素,如五因素得分(FF),并比较疗效和比较疗效和Azathioprine与脉冲环磷酰胺的安全性作为经历治疗失败或复发的患者的辅助免疫抑制治疗。方法:该前瞻性,多中心,治疗试验包括124名患者新诊断的PAN或MPA(FF为0),单独用皮质类固醇治疗。在治疗失败或疾病复发时,患者随机接受6个月的口服副唑或环磷酰胺6个脉冲。根据意图对治疗策略进行分析。结果:平均+/- SD跟进期为62 +/- 33个月。用皮质类固醇单独治疗98例患者的诱发缓解;这些患者的50(40%)持续缓解疾病缓解,46(37%)经历了复发,2种变为皮质类固醇依赖性(每日泼尼松剂量>或= 20mg)。在26名患者(21%)中,单独使用皮质类固醇治疗失败,49名患者(40%)需要额外的免疫抑制。在随机39名患者中,13个中的13个含有环磷酰胺脉冲的缓解,其中14个含有AzathioLine的缓解剂。在所有患者中,1年和5年生存率分别为99%和92%。在环磷酰胺治疗组中发生六种死亡,与氮嘌呤治疗组中的2个死亡相比。对于MPa患者而言,无病的存活率显着降低,而不是摇摄(P = 0.046)。结论:对于锅或MPA的患者,FF为0,总体5年生存率良好,但一线皮质类固醇治疗能够在仅大约一半的患者中获得和维持缓解,40%的患者所需的40%额外的免疫抑制治疗。杜鹃花或脉冲环磷酰胺对于治疗皮质类固醇抗性疾病或重大复杂是相当有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号