...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Smaller Inguinal Hernias are Independent Risk Factors for Developing Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain (CPIP) A Registry-based Multivariable Analysis of 57, 999 Patients
【24h】

Smaller Inguinal Hernias are Independent Risk Factors for Developing Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain (CPIP) A Registry-based Multivariable Analysis of 57, 999 Patients

机译:较小的腹股沟疝是开发慢性术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)的独立危险因素,其基于注册表的多变量分析为57,999名患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Impact of inguinal hernia defect size as stratified by the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification I to III on the rate of chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP). Background: CPIP is the most important complication after inguinal hernia repair. The impact of hernia defect size according to the EHS classification on CPIP is unknown. Methods: In total, 57,999 male patients from the Herniamed registry undergoing primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair including a 1-year follow-up were selected between September 1, 2009 and November 30, 2016. Using multivariable analysis, the impact of EHS inguinal hernia classification (EHS I vs EHS II vs EHS III and/or scrotal) on developing CPIP was investigated. Results: Multivariable analysis revealed for smaller inguinal hernias a significant higher rate of pain at rest [EHS I vs EHS II: odds ratio, OR = 1.350 (1.180-1.543),P< 0.001; EHS I vs EHS III and/or scrotal: OR = 1.839 (1.504-2.249),P< 0.001; EHS II vs EHS III and/or scrotal: OR = 1.363 (1.125-1.650),P= 0.002], pain on exertion [EHS I vs EHS II: OR = 1.342 (1.223-1.473),P< 0.001; EHS I vs EHS III and/or scrotal: OR = 2.002 (1.727-2.321),P< 0.001; EHS II vs EHS III and/or scrotal: OR = 1.492 (1.296; 1.717),P< 0.001], and pain requiring treatment [EHS I vs EHS II: OR = 1.594 (1.357-1.874),P< 0.001; EHS I vs EHS III and/or scrotal: OR = 2.254 (1.774-2.865),P< 0.001; EHS II vs EHS III and/or scrotal: OR = 1.414 (1.121-1.783),P= 0.003] at 1-year follow-up. Younger patients (<55 y) revealed higher rates of pain at rest, pain on exertion, and pain requiring treatment (eachP< 0.001) with a significantly trend toward higher rates of pain in smaller hernias. Conclusions: Smaller inguinal hernias have been identified as an independent patient-related risk factor for developing CPIP.
机译:目的:欧盟疝气(EHS)分类I至III对慢性术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)的影响,对腹膜疝缺陷尺寸的影响。背景:CPIP是Incuinal Hernia修复后最重要的并发症。根据EHS对CPIP的分类疝缺陷尺寸的影响是未知的。方法:在2009年9月1日至2016年9月30日期间,共有57,999名来自疝气注册表的疝气登记术患者,包括为期一年的单侧腹股沟修复,包括为期一年的后续行动。使用多变量分析,EHS腹股沟疝分类的影响(EHS I VS EHS II与EHS III和/或Clottal)在开发CPIP上进行了调查。结果:多变量分析显示较小的腹股沟疝的显着较高的疼痛率在休息中显着[EHS I VS EHS II:差距比,或= 1.350(1.180-1.543),P <0.001; EHS I VS EHS III和/或阴囊:或= 1.839(1.504-249),P <0.001; EHS II与EHS III和/或阴囊:或= 1.363(1.125-1.650),p = 0.002],施加疼痛[EHS I VS EHS II:OR = 1.342(1.223-1.473),P <0.001; EHS I VS EHS III和/或阴囊:或= 2.002(1.727-2.321),P <0.001; EHS II VS EHS III和/或阴囊:或= 1.492(1.296; 1.717),P <0.001]和需要治疗疼痛[EHS I VS EHS II:OR = 1.594(1.357-1.874),P <0.001; EHS I VS EHS III和/或阴囊:或= 2.254(1.774-2.865),P <0.001; EHS II VS EHS III和/或阴囊:或= 1.414(1.121-1.783),P = 0.003]在1年随访时。年轻患者(<55 y)揭示了休息的疼痛率较高,膨胀疼痛,需要治疗的疼痛(每两倍<0.001),较小疝气疼痛的速度较高。结论:较小的腹股沟疝已被鉴定为开发CPIP的独立患者相关的危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号