...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of surgery. >Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:抗生素预防手术前的脊髓夹在选修剖宫产中的脊髓钳下:双盲,前瞻性,随机,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

CONTEXT: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during elective cesarean delivery at term to reduce postoperative maternal infectious morbidity is generally used but may not be effective on the basis of the available data. Also, the optimal timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of cefazolin administered before skin incision vs cefazolin administered after umbilical cord clamping vs placebo in a 3-arm randomized trial. The primary objective of the study was to compare postoperative infectious morbidity, defined as wound infection, endometritis, or urinary tract infection (primary end point), in women with cefazolin vs placebo. The comparison between the 2 arms administering cefazolin before skin incision vs after umbilical cord clamping was a secondary end point. DESIGN: Double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. PATIENTS: We recruited 1112 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery at term from March 1, 2004, through January 31, 2010. INTERVENTIONS: In group 1, cefazolin (2 g) was administered 20 to 30 minutes before skin incision. In group 2, cefazolin (2 g) was administered immediately after clamping of the cord. In group 3, placebo was administered before skin incision. RESULTS: The primary outcome was observed in 18 of 370 women in group 1 (4.9%) and in 14 of 371 women in group 2 (3.8%), whereas it was noted in 45 of 371 women in group 3 (12.1%) (P < .001 for group 1 plus group 2 vs group 3). The number needed to treat to avoid 1 primary outcome was 13 (95% CI, 9 to 24). Between groups 1 and 2, there was no statistically significant difference regarding postoperative infectious morbidity (P = .60). CONCLUSION: We were able to demonstrate the usefulness in elective cesarean delivery of prophylactic cefazolin vs placebo in reducing postoperative maternal infectious morbidity.
机译:背景信息:通常使用术语以减少术后母体传染病的选修剖宫产期间的围手术期抗生素预防,但在可用数据的基础上可能没有有效。而且,预防性抗生素给药的最佳定时尚不清楚。目的:比较脐带夹竹桃饲养前饲喂皮肤切口施用的疗效与3臂随机试验中的脐带夹住后饲养脐带。该研究的主要目标是将术后感染性发病率进行比较,被定义为伤口感染,子宫内膜炎或泌尿道感染(泌尿道感染(主要终点),在患有Cefazolin VS安慰剂的妇女中。在脐带夹紧后皮肤切口前施用Cefazolin的2臂与次要终点的比较是次要终点。设计:双盲,前瞻性,随机,安慰剂对照试验。环境:奥地利维也纳维也纳医科大学妇产科系。患者:从2004年3月1日,我们招聘了1112名正在从2010年3月1日到2010年1月31日接受选修剖宫产的妇女。干预:在第1组,在皮肤切口前施用12〜30分钟。在第2组中,在夹紧帘线后立即施用Cefazolin(2g)。在第3组中,安慰剂在皮肤切口之前施用。结果:第1次(4.9%)的370名妇女中有18名(4.9%)和第2组妇女中的14名(3.8%),均涉及主要结果(371名),而第3组中的45名(371名妇女)(12.1%)( p <.001组1加上第2组VS组3)。治疗避免1初级结果所需的数量为13(95%CI,9至24)。在第1组和第2组之间,没有关于术后感染性发病率的统计学意义差异(p = .60)。结论:我们能够证明在术后母体传染病中的预防性Cefazolin VS安慰剂的选修剖宫产递送的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号