...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of surgery. >Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:选择性剖宫产术前和闭路后预防抗生素的预防:一项双盲,前瞻性,随机,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

CONTEXT: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during elective cesarean delivery at term to reduce postoperative maternal infectious morbidity is generally used but may not be effective on the basis of the available data. Also, the optimal timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of cefazolin administered before skin incision vs cefazolin administered after umbilical cord clamping vs placebo in a 3-arm randomized trial. The primary objective of the study was to compare postoperative infectious morbidity, defined as wound infection, endometritis, or urinary tract infection (primary end point), in women with cefazolin vs placebo. The comparison between the 2 arms administering cefazolin before skin incision vs after umbilical cord clamping was a secondary end point. DESIGN: Double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. PATIENTS: We recruited 1112 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery at term from March 1, 2004, through January 31, 2010. INTERVENTIONS: In group 1, cefazolin (2 g) was administered 20 to 30 minutes before skin incision. In group 2, cefazolin (2 g) was administered immediately after clamping of the cord. In group 3, placebo was administered before skin incision. RESULTS: The primary outcome was observed in 18 of 370 women in group 1 (4.9%) and in 14 of 371 women in group 2 (3.8%), whereas it was noted in 45 of 371 women in group 3 (12.1%) (P < .001 for group 1 plus group 2 vs group 3). The number needed to treat to avoid 1 primary outcome was 13 (95% CI, 9 to 24). Between groups 1 and 2, there was no statistically significant difference regarding postoperative infectious morbidity (P = .60). CONCLUSION: We were able to demonstrate the usefulness in elective cesarean delivery of prophylactic cefazolin vs placebo in reducing postoperative maternal infectious morbidity.
机译:背景:为减少术后产妇传染病的发生率,通常在选择性剖宫产期间围手术期预防抗生素使用,但根据现有数据可能无效。而且,预防性抗生素给药的最佳时机还不清楚。目的:在一项3组随机试验中,比较皮肤切口前使用头孢唑林与脐带夹闭后头孢唑林与安慰剂的有效性。该研究的主要目的是比较头孢唑林与安慰剂妇女的术后感染率,定义为伤口感染,子宫内膜炎或尿路感染(主要终点)。次要终点是在皮肤切开之前和脐带夹紧之后两个使用头孢唑林的手臂之间的比较。设计:双盲,前瞻性,随机,安慰剂对照试验。地点:奥地利维也纳维也纳医科大学妇产科。患者:我们招募了1112名从2004年3月1日至2010年1月31日进行选择性剖宫产的妇女。干预措施:在第1组中,在皮肤切开前20至30分钟给予头孢唑啉(2 g)。在第2组中,头孢扎林(2 g)在夹住脐带后立即给药。在第3组中,在皮肤切开之前施用安慰剂。结果:在第一组的370名妇女中有18名(4.9%)和第二组的371名妇女中有14名(3.8%)观察到了主要结局,而在第三组的371名妇女中有45名(12.1%)观察到了主要结局(对于第1组加上第2组与第3组,P <.001)。为避免1项主要结局需要进行治疗的人数为13(95%CI,9至24)。在第1组和第2组之间,术后感染的发病率无统计学差异(P = 0.60)。结论:我们能够证明预防性头孢唑林与安慰剂的选择性剖宫产在降低术后产妇传染病发病率方面的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号